qalmakka29 minutes ago
> Run Android apps natively on Apple Silicon Macs. No emulator, no virtual machine, no Linux underneath.
God damnit Dario fix Claude already so that it stops using this sentence structure once and for all. Opus is so annoyingly recognisable that it has started to irk me badly lately
tty45614 minutes ago
How would you prefer it. Does it not get the point across? Why does it even matter to you?
mahboi2 minutes ago
For one, say what it does instead of what it doesn't do
user439284 minutes ago
"Run Android apps natively on Apple Silicon Macs. Uses translation instead of emulation."
No, slop generally doesn't get the point across efficiently.
It's hard to parse, it's grating, and in addition to the strange language you have to apply additional skepticism due to gross inaccuracy being more likely than in human-written text.
axus11 minutes ago
Variety is the Spice of Life
bilalq3 hours ago
In practice, the Google Play Services dependencies and other walled-garden initiatives from Google will make this less useful than it could otherwise be. But still, this is really cool.
figmert3 hours ago
Doohickey-d3 hours ago
I guess, in practice this can also be likely be made to run google services, the same as they can run on custom ROMs. And it already lists Aurora store as a solution.
So it's definitely something for more tinkerer people, but still quite cool.
als03 hours ago
Everything aside from apps with SafetyNet dependencies. Banking apps come to mind.
chaosharmonic3 hours ago
Also, a lot of games. This is actually why I stopped playing Pokemon Go, and never picked up a worse gacha game habit haha
direwolf20an hour ago
Pokémon Go had a good reason - it turned out to be foreign intelligence gathering operation and couldn't risk being corrupted with false data.
tadfisher26 minutes ago
What? Niantic (Google) admitted they were training spatial AI models. I have not seen evidence that the data was a "foreign intelligence-gathering operation" and I would welcome a source.
thesuitonyman hour ago
Sure, but who would use a banking app when the web site is right there and has more features and generally works better?
cute_boian hour ago
These days many banks only allows app for "enhanced safety"
franga20003 hours ago
Soo many more things than banking apps at this point. Things as normal as looking at train schedules, grocery store catalogues, ordering a taxi... sometimes have SafetyNet DRM.
When you publish apps on Google Play, the Play Developer Console even nags you to use harder obfuscation and implement Google's DRM to, allegedly, protect yourself and your users.
Can the EU finally make this shit illegal? Oh wait, they're pusing for mandatory DRM too... Fuck.
direwolf20an hour ago
Banks want your money so try it anyway. Not all drive away their customers.
AtHeartEngineer42 minutes ago
time to RE play services
monocasa36 minutes ago
People are way ahead of you.
AtHeartEngineer10 minutes ago
hell ya, I love the internet
dawnerd2 hours ago
It's also pretty easy just to spin up bluestacks if you really need android apps on a mac.
kelvinjps102 hours ago
You can run it with microg
chaosharmonic3 hours ago
Optimist take: this will matter less over time as more developers start targeting Steam devices
e12e40 minutes ago
Or matter more, as chromeOS is killed and Android comes to laptop form factor?
[deleted]3 hours agocollapsed
gambiting3 hours ago
...what steam devices? Steam Deck and Machine? I work in video games(at one of the largest publishers - worked at other two in the last few years) - and while we usually do some testing on the steam deck it's literally just to see if the windows version runs well. Full on Linux porting effort like Larian did for BG3 is very very rare and extremely hard to justify.
freedomben3 hours ago
In your experience, is "Steam Deck Verified" attractive enough to fix any issues you might find when testing? I've been immensely curious about whether it's moved the needle at all
Rohansi2 hours ago
Most games run on Steam devices via Proton (Wine). You don't really need a native port in that case.
mgol942 hours ago
And I hate it with a passion. Publishers have no problem taking money from Linux users, only to ignore Linux-related bug reports and tell people “it’s not supported.”
I really hope Steam will use its position soon to either let users get refunds when devs break their games or force the gaming industry to support the Linux users they’re making money from.
Rohansian hour ago
That's really what the (Deck/Machine/SteamOS) Verified program is for. Valve tests games out on those platforms and reports results back for everyone on the store page. Publishers have the control to explicitly mark it as unsupported too.
gambitingan hour ago
...I mean, you're buying a windows version, then complaining that it's not running well on an unsupported operating system?
DaiPlusPlus3 hours ago
> Full on Linux porting effort like Larian did for BG3 is very very rare and extremely hard to justify
Given the zeitgeist, how realistic are the calls to “just get AI to do it”? I’ve been rattled by just how good some one-shot (or otherwise low-human-effort) Claude ports of some games are (and I don’t mean “decomps”, but instead where an existing open-source and already-cross-platform codebase is ported over to new targets like WASM+Canvas, like C&C Generals: the AI-bros are in full-force posting demos of their new ports on a nearly daily basis - so if it’s as easy as these people say, why aren’t we seeing it from the major publishers?
nomel2 hours ago
> why aren’t we seeing it from the major publishers?
Models are just recently capable of reliably doing this type of deeper work, which is why you're only seeing it now. There hasn't really been enough time to see it. And still, why? Modern gaming on Linux is almost always on accident, with the devs targeting windows, with no thoughts of Linux at all. Seems like it would make more sense to point the AI at wine, to make linux run Windows better.
cyanydeez2 hours ago
figuring out how to get PWA working would be a much better goal.
direwolf20an hour ago
Is this your experience or are you repeating something you heard somewhere?
bilalq44 minutes ago
I'm no expert on the matter, but I've developed and published multiple Android apps to the Play Store. Some of those apps have needed Google Play Services APIs. Google has also been actively making moves to lock down control and offering things like the Play Integrity API that some apps use.
By your phrasing, it sounds like you're implying my understanding is wrong somehow. If so, what am I missing?
paimapian hour ago
I'm not the commenter but this is my experience in about 10% or so of cases. I've been running a network audit of baby tracking apps and the information they phone home with (results are pretty Orwellian so far) and a few of the apps have been virtually impossible to emulate without an active Google Play account that is verified against Google's servers.
bobsmooth3 hours ago
Can MicroG be ported?
f17428d275843 hours ago
Handy for Minecraft players on Mac: windows players may be on Java or on bedrock versions, but mobile and console players are all only on bedrock. Being able to run the Android version on Mac means I can play with local console players or join a bedrock realm.
(There are compatibility workarounds if you run your own server but I don’t want the headache of doing so).
Perhaps one day Mojang will enable Macos users to run the iPad (bedrock) version of Minecraft as well..
nomel2 hours ago
> Perhaps one day Mojang will enable Macos users to run the iPad (bedrock)
I predict they will, once macOS drops intel support in macOS 28.
mahboia few seconds ago
What does Intel support have to do with this?
[deleted]2 hours agocollapsed
forgotpwd163 hours ago
Funnily, specifically for Minecraft Bedrock, there's such a project (implementing a limited/specialized compatibility layer) targeting Linux/macOS for few years now.
VCFundedGenYer3 hours ago
There was a solution on macOS for quite some time (https://github.com/minecraft-linux/macos-builder/) but Apple is killing off the OpenGL frameworks to make it work.
012973981605an hour ago
Meanwhile I ignore most of the posts here that are Apple-related, this one was able to draw my attention. Checked the 'how it works' page and was impressed how easily Claude made the 32-to-64 bit ARM translator for you. We need more effort of this kind for the x86 ecosystem, generated or not, but the mobile-app-everything culture becomes really annoying and needs to be fought this way.
rfgplk31 minutes ago
Claude didn't make this, the author did.
dcreateran hour ago
Doesn't this instead just exacerbate the problem allowing the mobile app for everything dogma to exist more easily?
MBCookan hour ago
Is this significantly useful to anyone?
It’s a neat accomplishment. And it was worth doing for that alone. Absolutely hacker worthy.
But as someone with an Apple Silicon Mac, I can run iOS apps on my computer if the developer has allowed it and I don’t. I’ve never come up with an actual need. It turns out it’s never really a problem for me.
The few things I use a lot on my phone already have desktop equivalents. The long tail stuff tends to be stuffed that I wouldn’t really use from my computer anyway. Like locking my car or using a banking app. One I don’t need, the other is already covered by the website.
So I’m wondering if anyone has found a strong use for this kind of tools.
hex4def637 minutes ago
What about that chinese cat feeder whose app requires a suspicious number of permissions, and requires max version of android 2 versions behind the current one?
Or maybe your security camera has a "free" plan without motion detection, and you just keep the app running with a screen grab on top to do your own AI motion detection.
Or my eero router, which doesn't have a web interface... etc etc.
There's a million cheap hardware gadgets that are going to lose sw support at some time, and stop being functional. This will help a lot with that.
bilalq41 minutes ago
As someone who develops iOS and Android apps, I run production, store-installed variants on my Mac all the time for iOS apps. It's pretty nice and would be cool if I could do the same for Android.
hypfer4 hours ago
Arguably not a bad use of a claude subscription, provided that it actually works.
Broiler94372 hours ago
Cross-platform has never been easier than ever
tantalor4 hours ago
Reminds me of Google vs. Oracle lawsuit for API fair use.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_LLC_v._Oracle_America,_....
Zigurd3 hours ago
Google v Oracle comes down to an argument over infringement when copying constants. IANAL but I would've said constants are facts and not protectable.
mkirsten3 hours ago
Crazy I was the first to star on GitHub. I’m going to give this a try for some tinkering projects.
bsimpson3 hours ago
People take the iOS version of Fortnite and repackage it to run on Mac.
dmonterocrespo2 hours ago
Great project...it would be awesome to be able to run APK on the iPhone
sirjaz4 hours ago
This is awesome, now this needs to work on Windows
Tarball103 hours ago
Windows had something like this (Windows Subsystem for Android) which worked really well until Microsoft went and killed it.
pndyan hour ago
Yeah, Microsoft tried 'both ways' to expand their quite small Windows Phone applications catalogue. And while Project Astoria [1] aimed at bringing Android apps, Project Islandwood was about easing porting of iOS applications [2]. Then MS decided that Windows Phone platform has no future.
[1] - https://www.windowslatest.com/2016/02/26/project-astoria-por...
[2] - https://www.windowslatest.com/2016/02/09/project-islandwood-...
forgotpwd163 hours ago
WSA was (or is, since still works unofficially) running Android in VM underneath.
majorchord3 hours ago
BlueStacks has worked really well for me.
maxloh2 hours ago
It is based on VM, so it is a lot slower.
You can't even run Instagram on a low-end laptop.
inknight2 hours ago
isn't BlueStacks full of chinese ads nowadays?
dawnerd2 hours ago
Unfortunately. But there really isn't anything out there as reliable as it.
majorchord2 hours ago
I wouldn't know, I block all Chinese IPs at my router.
tuomas23 hours ago
This is very cool! Next IOS.apk? ;)
forgotpwd162 hours ago
macOS includes[0] a built-in iOS compatibility subsystem. PlayCover allows utilizing it for running arbitrary iOS apps.
[0]: https://developer.apple.com/documentation/apple-silicon/runn...
wffurran hour ago
And yet somehow Microsoft / Mojang don't see fit to enable Minecraft Bedrock for iPads on Macs. Pretty frustrating for cross-platform play. It's pretty funny that Bluestacks / Mac.apk work just fine for playing the Android Bedrock version on a Mac when the iOS app is right there.
VCFundedGenYer3 hours ago
[flagged]
tamimio2 hours ago
Slightly off topic, what skill/diagram tool did you use to make the diagrams?
LoganDark3 hours ago
Couple issues with this right off the bat:
- Seemingly relies on the Java virtual machine for simulation -- no support for native ARM binaries?
- Stores data inside the .app
yincrash2 hours ago
Looks like it will run native ARM just fine according to the readme?
LoganDark2 hours ago
I saw a hint of machine code recompilation in the libraries list (like capstone), but couldn't find enough to verify if recompilation means more than just extracting the dalvik stuff and reformatting it to run on a normal JVM
leopoldcongo2 hours ago
you didnt read the page did you.
LoganDark40 minutes ago
I read the page, but didn't clone the repository locally to run an AI agent over it.
[deleted]3 hours agocollapsed
iAMkenough3 hours ago
No app sandboxing? User files and settings stored in the /Applications/ folder, rather than the User’s home folder?
[deleted]2 hours agocollapsed
VCFundedGenYer3 hours ago
Naming it Mac.apk is a poor choice. So it's Mac.apk.app?
Overall this repo has a lot of tells of a low quality LLM generated app. Many issues with data structuring, naming etc.
[deleted]2 hours agocollapsed
flockedop5 hours ago
[flagged]
dang3 hours ago
This looks like a great submission! But I wanted to let you know that some of your recent comments have been killed by our software because they've been classified as genai text, which is not allowed on HN itself (see https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html#generated and https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47340079).
(Of course it's fine to use AI tools! We use them heavily ourselves. Just please don't use them to generate or edit text to be read by fellow humans on Hacker News itself.)
It's impossible to know for sure what was LLM generated or edited, but we have to rely on imperfect classifiers or else the site would be completely flooded by genai text, which is not what the community here wants to read, nor in the intended spirit of HN.
ls-a2 hours ago
[dead]