iamjackgan hour ago
Yeah, this happened to me the other day. I completely missed their "please upgrade now" email on Sep 1st and was running a 13 month old version. I got a notification that my home server was at 100% usage, and found the miner right away. At least they were nice enough to name the process "mylovelyminer."
coreyburnsdevan hour ago
I find plex unusable since the latest UI updates in any place but my PC browser. It's so slow that Jellyfin is really my only option now. Did the vibe-code the new changes or what?
Loughla12 minutes ago
It's not unusable on my shield but it's definitely worse. Not just 'change is bad' worse, but actually worse.
Selecting a season and then the episode gives you the episode summary instead of just playing the episode.
Hitting back on an episode brings up a side menu sometimes and others it leaves the episode like it should.
Why Plex?
whycome38 minutes ago
There seems to be widespread disdain for it. AFAIK they switched to a shared codebase to make it easy for the devs to deploy to multiple devices. But, it came at the expense of UX for pretty much all devices. They don’t use native video services on things like iPhone.
cosmic_cheese10 minutes ago
[dead]
robotnikman9 minutes ago
Yes, its completely unusable on my fire stick. I ended up sideloading the old apk.
gdulli32 minutes ago
The new UI version never made it to the Xbox client so that's what I switched to using about 6 months ago. As a bonus, I got to ditch my Roku altogether.
xavdid3 hours ago
I got hit with a cryptominer on my mac mini the other day. I only noticed because I happened to sitting in the room with it and noticed the fans were working overtime. There was a process, "icloud-services", which was using 100% of the CPU. It's sort of an indictment of Apple that my first inclination was "they've got a bug that's got an infinite loop" instead of "this is malicious software".
After a reboot, I traced it back to a folder in `Library/Application Support` which included a `config.json` that mentioned gulf[.]moneroocean[.]stream, so I knew I'd been popped. Cleanup was easy enough (the files themselves, plus the launch daemon), but it's annoying.
I don't do dev work on that machine (it's really just for plex & stuff) so it must have been some sort of vulnerability in Plex (but not the one described in OP) or macOS itself. Interestingly, I was up to date on my Plex install, but my macOS version was behind what was apparently an important security update related to an RCE (Sequoia 15.8).
whycome37 minutes ago
Well damn. Here I was thinking I’m okay because Plex is up to date even if my OS isn’t…
foobarian5 hours ago
> internet-facing Plex servers
This is terrifying. Who runs things like this open to the outside?
wolrah3 hours ago
> This is terrifying. Who runs things like this open to the outside?
Probably the majority of people with a Plex Pass subscription and most Plex users in general.
As far as I see it, Plex's primary purpose is to allow people who have extensive collections of legally obtained digital media to conveniently access it and share access to their friends and family on pretty much any random device from anywhere in the world.
All my home media devices run Kodi, they run Jellyfin, they run all sorts of fully open stuff, but when I travel Plex wins because it runs on basically anything that can stream video and I can sign in to it in seconds without needing to connect a VPN or enter my password on someone else's device.
falkensmaize3 hours ago
Plex in particular is notoriously insecure. It should never be accessible to the open internet unless via a vpn like WireGuard. Just playing with fire otherwise.
eddythompson802 hours ago
Almost all selfhosted services are in that bucket now. Everything from Plex, Jellyfin, to nextcloud or gitea/forgejo. Few months ago I went through all my setup and moved everything to a vpn. The only service I kept public is a static directory served by nginx where I keep some html food recipes I shared with a friend before.
It's less convenient to use and pretty much impossible to share with others. I can figure out a VPN on all my devices for the most part (except for a Boox ereader). Trying to get "family and friends" to install and maintain a VPN on their devices to be able to access services I share with them is a pipe dream.
nannal2 hours ago
Gitea got hit with a similar issue about a month back.
DaSHacka3 hours ago
That may be true, but how do you grant non-technical family/friends access? They don't even understand what a VPN is, let alone how to toggle one on/off to access the Jellyfin instance.
Additionally, if they try to connect from an Android TV / Fire Stick, where you can't configure a VPN (and use their ISP's modem, so no wireguard client on the router to transparently route to the subnet), what are you supposed to do?
I feel it may be easier long-term to just contain the Jellyfin daemon to only r/o access to media, putting it behind a subdomain like jellyfin.example.com, and use the dns-01 challenge via LE to only provision a wildcard cert for the domain (IE *.example.com).
Then, have nginx listen on 80/443 with a default server directive that returns 444 for any requests not to the (correct) jellyfin hostname (due to bots hammering 80/443 across the internet on webserver's direct IPs).
Its the only solution I can think of to make it easy for nontechnical users (everything just described is completely invisible to a regular client) while reducing the attack surface area of the daemon.
FWIW, with the aforementioned setup, I got 0 unauthorized requests to my jellyfin server. Just a bunch of bots hammering my IP's 80/443 ports directly with exploits for old (usually wordpress) vulns, but they were all served 444 (IE an immediate TCP connection close without nginx even responding to the request).
yegle2 hours ago
Tailscale is easy to explain.
"Install this app on your Apple TV or Android TV, login with your Gmail, and let me know your email address."
financetechbroan hour ago
Yes I’ve successfully explained Tailscale to anyone that has had a corporate job and has experience having to log into a work computer VPN before accessing their work intranet
izacus3 hours ago
Any citation for that or is that notoriety something that grew in your head?
wolrah2 hours ago
Did you miss the point about working on random devices? That's the key to why I use Plex at all. If I have to install and set up a VPN client on it I'd just use Jellyfin because at that point I've limited myself to only my devices.
Also of course friends/family. The most technologically useless people I know can operate Plex and can access my collection with basically no support necessary.
walthamstow3 hours ago
I don't think any more than 5% of Plex users are using it for legally-obtained content.
ppchain2 hours ago
To be fair, this is Plex's intended use case. It is not a bizarre or unsupported config to expose Plex to the internet. It is designed to be on the network so that many different invited users can all log in and access your media. This model doesn't work if they all need to be on a tailnet or similar. Maybe Plex is less secure than nginx serving a web page, but its just a matter of a trust threshold.
If it were just me using Plex then it would be different, but I can't realistically expect all my friends and family to get on a tailnet, and so I take the risk with an up-to-date Plex on the internet.
dewey4 hours ago
Many people, as your TV and sometimes friends have to connect to it and you don't want to explain Tailscale to them.
benoau4 hours ago
You largely have to for Plex themselves to middleman access to your media collection.
doublepg233 hours ago
I'll fully admit I do.
The point of Plex is sharing your library with less ... technical users.
If I didn't want to do that, I'd not even use Jellyfin- SMB share and mpv would be fine with me.
blntechie4 hours ago
I do run it open to the outside through cloudflare tunnels. I don't want to connect my TVs to tailscale every time to play a movie.
bigstrat20034 hours ago
I do. I like to stream music from my server onto my phone when I'm out and about. And it's authenticated, so there's nothing terrifying about exposing it (security vulnerabilities aside, but that can happen to any software you expose).
DaSHackaan hour ago
If it's only your own clients connecting to it, have you looked into Tailscale? Even as a selfhost-all-the-things type of guy, I've been convinced. This is exactly why I started experimenting with it too, due to Android now allowing multiple VPNs at the same time. It replaced my previous setup of hosting parts of my homelab technically exposed to the internet, which were only used by my phone since it already had an always-active mullvad.
bigstrat20035 minutes ago
I tried it once but had some issues where it was hard to get the Tailscale DNS to play nicely with my container setup. It's been a couple of years so I may be misremembering, but I want to say the issue was that it only would resolve names to the IP of the host, not the containers themselves. That could've changed by now, of course.
thejazzman3 hours ago
Feeling very validated that I went with Iroh @ https://pixelbrite.site
rumblefrog3 hours ago
This is my first time hearing about Pixel Brite, what's the history behind it?
happytoexplain3 hours ago
Essentially every technical person I know.
symlinkk4 hours ago
Plex themselves literally recommend it and show a warning icon if it’s not accessible outside your local network. I always thought it was insane. To make matters worse their Synology package doesn’t auto update itself. I would guess there are a ton of vulnerable boxes sitting out there.
Orygin3 hours ago
What get me the most, are the rabid Plex fanbois swearing that having jellyfin open on the internet is such a baaaad idea and you should spend ~50~ ~100~ 500 bucks for a sub to Plex which totally don't expose the same risk
NoMoreNicksLeft2 hours ago
I wouldn't go that far. It's just Jellyfin is ugly as shit.
DaSHacka34 minutes ago
When was the last time you tried it? I used to agree, but at least as of last year, it must've undergone a UI overhaul as now it looks quite nice imo.
iAMkenough4 hours ago
If you’re exposing anything on Synology to the Internet, you’re already playing with fire. Their packages (like Container Manager) are usually very far behind on security patches.
I think the current version of Docker engine Synology uses was end-of-life 2.5 years ago.
thenthenthen3 hours ago
Yeah, please avoid Synology, really. If you have it or need it DONT expose it to the internet.
chrisweekly3 hours ago
Synology NAS - an ugly doorstop with data loss resulting from its half-baked post-purchase attempts to enforce hardware vendor lock-in. (Was working fine w/ a Western Digital drive, the next day, boom.)
quietsegfault3 hours ago
I’ve had a synology NAS that’s been running for 8 years. No data loss. I use random drives I had laying around. It’s not the fastest or fanciest, but I never had any experience with lock in. It’s got a 3rd party 10g card, more memory … nothing locked in.
TacticalCoder3 hours ago
> This is terrifying. Who runs things like this open to the outside?
A budy of mine has got 30 000 movies and series. Better offer than Netflix (what, easily 4x more choice!?). He's got a 42U rack. He gives free access to his server to his friends and family: it's not a business (so what he risks is also very limited in the country he lives in, for he's not making a business out of it).
It's not because you and I don't run Plex servers accessible from the big bad Internet that others don't enjoy doing it.
Now concerning this miner: I've posted about it in the past here on HN but I only run Jellyfin on my LAN and it's only with throwaway containers: I've got a script that sets up movies/series named/organized the way Jellyfin likes it, then that volume is passed read-only to a transient podman container.
When we're done watching the movie, the podman container is deleted. It's over: it doesn't exists anymore.
All that I care about are data: like family pictures and movies (and, say, other movies).
My Jellyfin server is just a temporary "view" on my actual data.
I don't trust it and don't need to trust it: for it's only future after I'm done watching the movie is to be destroyed.
mewse-hn2 hours ago
I'm finding the idea of spawning then killing Jellyfin over and over again like Groundhog Day really funny
ImPostingOnHN2 hours ago
Neat! So when you're on your tv stick or whatever, before deciding that you want to watch any movie in particular (so before the ephemeral jellyfin container is running), how does the movie selection process work?
And how did you set up the trigger to automatically spin up the ephemeral jellyfin container when a movie is selected?
Thanks!
2OEH8eoCRo05 hours ago
Reddit discussion here: https://www.reddit.com/r/PleX/comments/1x95krg/inthewild_exp...
Affects an older version of Plex and was patched in August.
TheCondor2 hours ago
Did they start doing automatic updates?
I have a lifetime subscription, I use plex to share the media with the wife and kids on all of our devices, it does the job. I won't bitch about their streaming ambitions, but doing automatic updates and taking security seriously would go far for them.
eddythompson8044 minutes ago
You can opt-in automatic updates. If you install the non-container package, you can set it to auto upgrade.
With containers it's a questionable/clunky implementation but possible. It only works in one flavor of their official image. On startup it will check if there is an update and download it and replace the application in the container. It breaks the point of containers obviously. It also only runs on startup, so you need to restart the container to get it to run.
peezdan hour ago
Nope, at least not on the platform I'm on. Just get the popup when accessing media when there is an update and can automate it or schedule for evening, but no way to automatically update it.
HaloZeroan hour ago
I don't think they force upgrade but it looks like the fix was part of 1.43.3 and my app is on 1.43.4
Hetaireia4 hours ago
[flagged]