https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boulevard_du_Temple_(photograp...
https://web.archive.org/web/20261012120105/https://www.newyo..., https://archive.is/GC1u4
lubujackson8 days ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boulevard_du_Temple_(photograp...
Since they neglect to show you the full, actual photo.
mlmonkey8 days ago
Why TF would they not show the original??!
robotnikman6 days ago
Very interesting to see what the streets of a city looked like 200 years ago
programd8 days ago
For the record this is the actual photo discussed in the article
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boulevard_du_Temple_%28photogr...
[deleted]8 days agocollapsed
b33l6 days ago
I am immortal
staring at a working boy
"rub my shiny shoes!"donbox8 days ago
Paywalled :(
embedding-shape8 days ago
And also seemingly they put the worst possible version of the photo? Wikipedia has much better versions on the right-hand side: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boulevard_du_Temple_(photograp...
masfuerte8 days ago
I didn't notice. I have JS disabled and it just works.
colesantiago8 days ago
Why not pay for it then?
donbox8 days ago
I did but not all HN readers can.
colesantiago7 days ago
> I did but not all HN readers can.
Assuming HN is full of employees of technology companies and industries around the world.
Are you saying to me that the average software engineer can't afford $5 a month to a publication?
brettermeier6 days ago
Why do you think this is the situation for everyone here? Wtf.
donbox7 days ago
Yes