flopsamjetsaman hour ago
https://codeberg.org/TechPaula/LT6502b
Specs:
* 65C02 running at 10MHz
* 46KByte of user RAM
* EhBASIC 22p2 with custom extensions
* eWOZMON
* Compact Flash for storage
* Built in battery (7400mAh currently)
* USB-PD Rechargable
* 10.1" Screen with 1024x600 and 256 colours
* WiFi Modem (based on this - https://github.com/dhansel/WifiModem)
* nanoSwinSID for sound (as well as beeps)
donpdonp25 minutes ago
Very interesting project. It'd be nice to see video of it in action and what use cases the author had in mind. A pic in a different post shows the 48k ram chip, and not far away is an SD card of 1 gigabyte - that's a dramatic contrast. The storage can hold the contents of ram 21,845 times over. If an 8GB laptop today had the equivalent storage, it would be a disk of 174TB.
Browsing by tag 'lt6502b' gives other posts that have pictures of the motherboard. https://www.maddox.pro/?cat=65 (update: the codeberg link has all the relevant pics)
doubled112a few seconds ago
That's a CompactFlash card. You often see them used in places where an IDE drive would have been.
Rohansi3 minutes ago
The 6502 can't actually address more than that. The flash controller built into modern SD cards are also going to be significantly more powerful than the 6502. And I'm surprised you can even buy SD cards that small still!
Neywinyan hour ago
What an interesting layout for a mobile site. It had the archive and a bunch of other stuff before the post. I thought OP linked something wrong.
weinzierlan hour ago
Well, there was the Commodore SX 64. Not exactly lap sized but portable for sure.
kstrauser30 minutes ago
It weighed 23 pounds. It was approximately as portable as a tower PC. You could schlep one around, but it'd get heavy after a while.
user393938240 minutes ago
A 6502 is capable of most actual workloads people have, whose profiles actually haven’t changed much. Almost all of our compute goes to GUI and rendering stacks that decorate our actual work.
lukan18 minutes ago
Those people you speak of, how big are their numbers all in all you think? And is that a subgroup of a subgroup?
Because most people I know certainly have different workloads and need their rendering as part of the work, not to decorate it nicely.
But for keeping a distraction free digital diary, it might be a nice device.
[deleted]3 days agocollapsed
debo_36 minutes ago
When I saw the domain name, I thought this might be: