huffer10 hours ago
I just spilled my coffee; sorry for the trivial remark, but the name means 'pubic hairs' in Romanian. Apologies.. I thought it's better for you to know and ignore than not to (not quite a big population target for you, I imagine, anyway).
nxobject23 minutes ago
As Coq (now Rcoq) found to their chagrin... I'm convinced half of the reason Lean has surpassed Coq in mindshare in formal mathematics was because it's impossible to not chuckle at the name sometimes.
luis_cho4 hours ago
There was once a cloud conference in Brazil called ConaCloud. I'm guessing "cona" means something different in Brazilian Portuguese than it does in European Portuguese. In Portugal is a slang word for vagina.
dazzatron9 hours ago
schaamhaar.io was already taken
OptionOfT3 hours ago
Risky copy-paste of the day.
Vasbarlog6 hours ago
Also means cum in greek https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/φλόκι
mitxela6 hours ago
Do Greek people really say "Here comes the spunk!" when they're... you know?
Vasbarlog5 hours ago
Hahahaha, have never personally heard that.
khimaros4 hours ago
though not nearly as popular of an expression in that category as μαλάκας
stevekemp5 hours ago
One of the later pages mentions that the name came from "cirrocumulus floccus", the cloud formation.
adrian_b4 hours ago
In this case it is misspelled.
The Latin word is "flocci", which means hairs of wool, and it was also used to denote an insignificant thing.
English normally preserves the double consonants of Latin, and in this case it has already done this in the English words derived from "floccus", e.g. "to flocculate" and "flocculent".
In clouds, it was used due to the resemblance of those clouds with curly sheep wool.
illiac78625 minutes ago
You mean like Flikr, sonarr, tumblr, Waze…?
coolca6 hours ago
Also it means gays (not in a flattering way) in italian if you just change a letter.
pi-victor10 hours ago
you got here before me, had a good laugh tho.
thegagne7 hours ago
The cool part of this is it’s an example of what’s possible with a community of users armed with AI.
Many users, (myself included), had need to test cloud stuff locally, but had no tool to do so. Localstack exists, but it started rug pulling the free tier and they didn’t support all the features.
Meanwhile, Floci makes it easy to write your own cloud compatible test suite, then implement the feature to match. I was able to get a good enough coverage on a few features created in a weekend on the $20 tier of Claude to make it useful to me, then others picked up the work to round it out.
It’s really cool to see it grow.
didgeoridoo6 hours ago
I’d love to see this for stuff like Stripe, Twilio, etc - they’ve got sandboxes but this would be a lot easier and faster.
[deleted]22 minutes agocollapsed
microflash7 hours ago
Been using it for a while to run integration tests with Testcontainers [1]. It's very good and much more lightweight than Localstack.
catlifeonmars4 hours ago
Both localstack and floci live in this weird spot where for a lot of my applications, all the cloud-vendor specific stuff is abstracted out anyway. So the only time I need to touch the cloud is for testing the abstractions and do end to end testing. The abstractions can be tested against real cloud APIs as it is generally cheap to do and provides the highest fidelity results. End to end testing includes testing against a production-like environment, so again, more bang for your buck to just test against the cloud.
I’ve definitely reached for these local cloud tools from time to time, but in a well-architected piece of software, you aren’t getting that much value from them. Either you don’t have a hard cloud dependency, or you want a high fidelity test of a specific cloud dependency.
aeagentic10 hours ago
Would someone be interested in this but intended for production? Im already running a whole bunch of cloudflare and AWS services in my own AWS fake and it works surprisingly well! :)
michaelastreiko3 hours ago
Local stubs for cloud services are a lifesaver when you're a one-person shop and don't want a surprise bill just to test a webhook path.
mkirsten8 hours ago
This looks very cool! Is this only intended for testing and development, or as a feasible way to migrante away from e.g., GCP as well?
I’m interested in something that would allow me to over time migrante away from a GCP project that uses many services today - e.g., Datastore, FileStorage etc.
_bohm7 hours ago
Definitely not feasible to migrate off of actual cloud services using something like this.
VoidWhisperer5 hours ago
Most likely a false positive, but worth noting for the people who run the project: Malwarebytes currently flags the site as 'potentially unsafe' when trying to visit it - not sure what the best avenue for them to get that fixed beyond reaching out to Malwarebytes might be
n7384 hours ago
This is awesome, hope to see it mature over the years!
kwkelly7 hours ago
fakecloud is another project in the space, AWS only though https://fakecloud.dev/
rirze4 hours ago
I'm using fakecloud and it's dead simple to use. (like you said, aws only)
elendilm11 hours ago
Good work.
For us, floci-oci for object storage looks interesting. For everything else we have our own stack.
sinabis11 hours ago
[flagged]
hnacobsxph11 hours ago
[flagged]