rustcleaner21 minutes ago
IRC plus GNU Jami are still freedom respecting zones! I sincerely hope all this age verification crap causes cypherpunk FOSS solutions to grow in popularity.
iwontberude2 minutes ago
[dead]
shaoonban hour ago
Still required to use a video or ID card in the UK.
axus39 minutes ago
There was a brief window where you could submit fake biometrics through a third-party site to verify age on Discord, pretty sure I got the link from hackernews.
That made me feel better that Discord didn't need to store my ID or video of my face, and was only storing the results of some analysis and not the inputs.
Foskya2 hours ago
I actually like their implementation. I'm curious if it will be enough for governments, but it is nice that they are trying to persue a path without id checks
dsr_31 minutes ago
All the available paths turn into:
- give us your ID
- give us your biometrics
- give somebody, not necessarily Discord, a valid credit card
That's sll of the paths.
nemomarx19 minutes ago
If the account age estimation puts you in adult, it sounds like you don't need to do any of those?
I'd like to see details about their model there, but account age is at least better than a lot of systems like steam are doing for this.
EmbarrassedHelpan hour ago
They should not be trying to implement it globally. That is unacceptable.
peri-cl31 minutes ago
> "Rather than waiting to be told how to do it, we’re launching our own..."
Translation: we've found an excuse to hold our captive users hostage for their monetizable personal information, and we're leaping at the opportunity. Nothing obligates us to demand this data, but we deeply covet it.
> "We're launching this over the course of this week, so it may take a few days to..."
Translation: we'd like to limit the PR impact of our hostile acts by staggering them temporally, so that our users can't effectively coordinate social media protests.
esafak44 minutes ago
I like that the dialog indicates the service provider. Thumbs up for transparency.