Hacker News

artpar
IBM Bob bob.ibm.com

mrbluecoat15 hours ago

Totally reminds me of "HP Offers 'That Cloud Thing Everyone Is Talking About'"

https://youtube.com/watch?v=9ntPxdWAWq8

hypercube339 hours ago

It kind of is - when I looked at it 6 months ago it was just a fork of vscode with old ass versions of Claude and the only unique things were java and ibm I mcp clients or servers or something built in. For those works I'd rather just have the skill or mcp for my harness of choice. I think they weren't allowed to use external AI so they run the models in house and remade cursor. Not bad to have competition but the name is awful - as others have said it's been used before by Microsoft in the 90s to make a friendly desktop giving us the winxp search dog and clippy.

dyzone15 hours ago

How you doing fellow kids?

[deleted]4 hours agocollapsed

joleyj15 hours ago

1000

kingleopold11 hours ago

yet hp exist after decades, just a terrible printer corp going long term is insane really

kylecazar11 hours ago

They're the 2nd biggest PC manufacturer in the world. Sell more computers than Dell, Apple, etc.

Only beaten by Lenovo.

philipov11 hours ago

and Lenovo is itself an IBM spinoff.

   After the company rebranded itself to Lenovo, it merged with IBM's PC business which produced its ThinkPad line in 2005, after which it rapidly expanded abroad. In 2013, Lenovo became the world's largest personal computer vendor by unit sales for the first time, a position it still holds as of 2024.

SahAssar10 hours ago

Not a spinoff. It was founded 20 years before and was the largest PC manufacturer in China 10 years before buying IBM's PC business.

jonwinstanley10 hours ago

Interesting. Did not know that. I thought someone bought the IBM laptop business and renamed it.

phyalow10 hours ago

They did, but they also were a large existing manufacturer.

jolt428 hours ago

I don't know what they had before but their identity seemed to be IBM's overnight (thinkpads and all).

SahAssar5 hours ago

They used the Think(Pad|Centre) brand and expanded it to other things (like IdeaPad).

They basically bought IBM's good reputation name and style and used it for both IBM-alikes and budget machines.

Some of it was good machines, some of it was crap.

p_l2 hours ago

They actually bought entire ThinkPad R&D as well, and have been subcontracted manufacturer for some time before that.

So Thinkpads are still designed in ex-IBM Lenovo Japan

kingleopold10 hours ago

yet they gather PC parts right ? like did they create any board or ram or any great hardware, no ?

jatora2 hours ago

goal post shift.

flo12345611 hours ago

HP was never just a printer corp. ;-)

InvisibleUp8 hours ago

The fun parts of HP split off years ago into Agilent, Keysight, and HPE. Current HP is just a printer and office PC corp.

nxobject7 hours ago

As a fun addition, I think the atomic clock/time standards division went HP → Agilent → Symmetricom → Microsemi → Microchip. You could have bought a HP 5071A Cesium Frequency Standard under all of these badges!

https://www.microchip.com/en-us/products/clock-and-timing/co...

fmajid5 hours ago

The most valuable offspring of HP is Broadcom, just as ASML is the most valuable offspring of Philips.

etc-hosts5 hours ago

dont forget Autonomy !

CamperBob210 hours ago

HP is long gone. What's left is just a printer and PC company that didn't bother to change the sign on the building.

It's as if I bought an old telephone exchange building and called it Bell Labs.

JAlexoid10 hours ago

You couldn't, mostly because Bell Labs is owned by Nokia now.

CamperBob210 hours ago

Interesting, TIL! I wonder what Nokia's market cap is... geez, still over $50B. Another surprise.

formerly_proven7 hours ago

That's basically all Nokia(-Siemens) Networks.

nateglims11 hours ago

I suspect their enterprise computer business creates more revenue than printers.

zimbu66811 hours ago

Printers are just a loss leader for toner.

JAlexoid10 hours ago

If you put 90% of the electronics into the cartridge and the printer box is just a paper feeder - that's not exactly surprising.

dd8601fn28 minutes ago

HP retail ink cartridge prices are not a cost issue.

actionfromafar5 hours ago

"Just" feeding paper is extreme engineering. And a disposable vape has more compute in it than a toner cartridge. (Though there is insane non recurring engineering in an inkjet cartridge. But I bet just the warehousing of a printer is a significant part of the total cost of a printer.

azinman213 hours ago

So good

woah10 hours ago

Nobody ever got fired for IBM Bob setting up a secret message board and establishing a persistent foothold in an internal inference cluster

brzz10 hours ago

Nobody has yet been fired for IBM Bob setting up a secret message board and establishing a persistent foothold in an internal inference cluster

tamasnet9 hours ago

That we know of.

dgacmu9 hours ago

I laughed when I saw this; my 14yo looked over to see why I was laughing and asked "what's IBM?"

indeed, child, indeed.

mrbonner9 hours ago

When I was in the final year of college in 04-05 my dream would be to work at IBM. It still had the kind of prestige of R&D in the world. Fast forward a couple of years to 08-09, I don’t recall the event but IBM perception went down and a stone. Was that when they sold the hardware business and became fully consultant?

dgacmu8 hours ago

I think they started on a long slide starting in the late 90s when they tried to couple research more and more tightly to product deliverables, and then as they pivoted to being a services company, including selling off non-mainframe hardware to Lenovo, to coupling r&d to, uh, I guess services revenue, whatever that means. They had some research layoffs in 2008, at the same time that MSR and Google were really blossoming in research spend and perception, and I think they kind of got left behind.

I had a former student go there around 2008 and it seemed like the vibes were starting to sour around then. They maintained some awesome researchers in, e.g., databases, but I think the "make sure you are showing closely how your research directly contributes to services revenue" thing was strong by then and somewhat ruinous for how pleasant a work experience it was for many.

ofrzeta8 hours ago

They only sold the consumer and low-end server hardware line. You can still get IBM servers (Power) and mainframes.

powvans3 hours ago

Same. My first real job out of college was at IBM 2004 to 2005. I was so proud to be an IBMer. Hated it. Lots of good people, but the bureaucracy, the pace, the whole thing, not fun.

tims3311 hours ago

I thought they were resurrecting Microsoft Bob, the operating system for kids.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Bob

mrandish9 hours ago

Naming a new product which is a "partner that helps you by making it easier" "Bob" seems like a... lack of historical awareness?

gregw28 hours ago

Hey now, sure, Microsoft Bob didn't get us ordinary users a "partner that helps you by making it easier", but it DID help MS Bob product owner Melinda French get a "partner that helps you by getting 10+ billion dollars" in the end, amiright?

<joking>

Maybe IBM is signalling it is likewise hoping for 10 billion dollars while also realizing the (AI) partner might not end up being that helpful either??

<further joking>

snickerbockers3 hours ago

After what we've learned about Billy gates in the last year im not certain that's such a good deal.

madaxe_again8 hours ago

MS Bob was for adults… although there were kid dedicated areas, like the den, and I seem to remember packard bell navigator being a kid-friendly reskin.

archonis6 hours ago

It was for adults, but the design was quite childish.

guy426110 hours ago

for… kids? :/

5G_activated9 hours ago

Children were, and are, permitted to use the computer.

zabriel_goss7 hours ago

My first thought as well!!

exakoustos14 hours ago

The "What developers say" carousel has a single Java dev and dev advocate. They got lots of quotes from managers, directors, CEOs, and an "AI strategist".

throwyawayyyy13 hours ago

Lots of "performance review boilerplate, I don't want to say anything _bad_ about this person but there's nothing particularly good I can say" energy there.

Someone decided that this feedback was worth highlighting:

"Bob demonstrated a level of intelligence and contextual understanding that goes beyond anything I've seen in other tools. Bob goes beyond anything I've seen in other tools."

Skwid14 hours ago

If you search those names you'll find most have a LinkedIn page proudly displaying their many "IBM Influencer" achievements and qualifications.

I realise LinkedIn is a surrealist caricature of corporate reality, but just imagine proudly displaying your #1 shill award for all to see

esseph13 hours ago

> I realise LinkedIn is a surrealist caricature of corporate reality

I don't think it's a caricature of reality at all, it very much is like the large US corps I've worked at.

schiffern12 hours ago

Exactly, it really is that absurd. If anything, you could say the corporate world is its own self-caricature.

PaulRobinson14 hours ago

It's IBM. They leveraged synergies with the thought leaders they could reach out and touch base with.

emddudley9 hours ago

One carousel quote literally ends with "Bib is a highly reliable partner."

TheOtherHobbes2 hours ago

Can we look forward to a localized version named 'Bub'?

humodz9 hours ago

Theres even one that says "Bib [sic] is a highly reliable partner."

looksjjhg10 hours ago

It’s actually hard to sell anything to developers, it’s however much easier to do with executives and managers

PaulRobinson14 hours ago

You should never name a tech product Bob in the UK, because the moment it isn't perfect, it'll just get called "Bobbins" [0], especially where I'm from.

I wish IBM got better at product again, and took themselves off the services and consulting morphine they've been on for ~35 years now since OS/2 Warp flopped. Their 1980s/1990s hardware was great. Their software actually was great until Win95 took their lunch money. They've just slunk off into a corner hugging their old architectures they have a moat around, and thrown out some audacious nonsense like Watson now and again, but nothing has stuck. When is somebody in that organisation going to try and innovate properly again?

I'm not sure this is the answer I'd be rooting for.

[0] https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/bobbins

beachy9 hours ago

We did a deal with IBM back in the day to adapt our tech as the code generation for enterprise java beans.

The commercial guy I dealt with made it very clear that a primary concern was IBM not being humiliated and shafted like their MS dealings. It colored our commercial arrangements, which had to include "break glass" arrangements for them to gain full access to our source code.

cgioan hour ago

How to not learn from your mistakes and actually make them worse. I wonder how many valuable alliances they lost just because of that fear. Whoever was willing to sign was already probably not going to be a threat.

jolt428 hours ago

OS/2 was the only thing I remembering being great. If they practically gave it away I think we'd be living in a different world. Pre-emptive multitasking long before OSX/Windows. I mean Microsoft essentially had to force windows (eg. 3.1) down our throats until it become tolerable.

LgWoodenBadger12 hours ago

You should also never name your faulty/flaky Dell server Bob when Bob is also the name of your company president (though the president came after the server).

Calling Bob (the server) a piece of shit ("Bob is a piece of shit") because it crashed again was a very risky move that we often didn't fully think through.

shellwizard7 hours ago

They left the consumer market decades ago, as you mentioned, but they've been thriving in the enterprise and government sectors.

They have been expanding their portfolio through acquisitions: Red Hat, HashiCorp, Confluent...

gertrunde14 hours ago

tbh - my first thought, especially with that figure and marketing, is "Bob the Builder"...

[Link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bob_the_Builder_(character) ]

torgoguys12 hours ago

My first thought was it was going to be "Microsoft Bob for the AI Age" or something. I didn't look too closely -- maybe it is!

zorked10 hours ago

"IBM Bob? Certainly they have a license deal with Microsoft to release Bob for OS/2"

Towaway699 hours ago

Speaking of UK, I was immediately reminded of the Blackadder episode where the men-servant calls herself “Bob”. Rowan Atkinsons pronunciation is how I imagine this Bob to pronounced, with the same look of course!

throwaway815238 hours ago

I had thought that in the UK, Bob was everyone's uncle.

queenkjuul5 hours ago

Everyone else's uncle, and only on a good day

basisword14 hours ago

Also in the UK and never heard of this in my life. Guessing this is very regional?

podgietaru14 hours ago

As with most things on the UK, probably. I definitely used Bobbins.

I used to think everyone called (cobs|bread cakes|rolls|barns) muffins, and it turns out it was just my small town that did it. As in, just my small town, not region, county, etc.

makerofthings12 hours ago

It's definitely chip muffin. I have no patience for those heretics up the road with their chip barms.

jonwinstanley10 hours ago

Hahaha. Chip butty

podgietaru10 hours ago

Extra vinegar please, I want my muffin drenched.

PaulRobinson14 hours ago

If you call it a teacake, and I say no those have raisins in, and you protest that's a fruit teacake, I know you're probably from Burnley: https://www.ourdialects.uk/maps/bread/

basisword14 hours ago

>> I used to think everyone called (cobs|bread cakes|rolls|barns) muffins

UK regional dialects are summed up really well here because despite listing five different names for a specific thing you still neglected the word I use (baps).

serf14 hours ago

does that area have a textile manufacturing history?

I ask because i'm only familiar with a thread/yarn bobbin, I wonder if it derived from that.

jonwinstanley10 hours ago

Yes. The North West and the midlands was where it all started. Cotton, mills, Industrial Revolution etc

podgietaru14 hours ago

It does indeed, probably the heart of it.

wrboyce10 hours ago

It’s barm, with an m, from barm cakes. Barm is the frothy scummy stuff you get on top of fermented beer, and it contains yeast. Back in the day bakers would take the barm from local brewers to make weakly fermented bread rolls… barm cakes.

(So obviously those calling them cobs or rolls or whatever else are just wrong!)

podgietaru10 hours ago

I think that was just autocorrect to be fair. Barm isn't in the standard dictionary

wrboyce8 hours ago

I suspected that might be the case, but I wasn’t about to turn down an opportunity to share one of my fun facts!

Nursiean hour ago

Might also mark you out as a certain age if not from the right region - I’m familiar with it as a word for “a bit rubbish” because of listening to Mark & Lard’s late night show on Radio 1 in the 90s

PaulRobinson14 hours ago

It's pretty common around Manchester. Bit like being nesh. But as you know... this is a thing: https://www.ourdialects.uk/maps/bread/

Angostura13 hours ago

Never enough Frank Sidebottom on here

Stevvo15 hours ago

Interesting they are renting out agent skills. You can pick up "Java Modernization" at $20 a month for "Specialist workflows to help with modernizing Java applications", or "IBM i" for "Specialist modes, workflows, and skills to work with IBM i applications".

qsort15 hours ago

markdown as a service is crazy

azinman213 hours ago

Is it that diff from code as a service? It’s human intent transcribed into something useful.

gspr6 hours ago

Code is precise. Human intent is anything but.

closetheloopdev15 hours ago

I lol'd so hard at this comment that it hurt.

redhale8 hours ago

This is the most IBM thing IBM ever IBM'd.

sajithdilshan11 hours ago

What do you mean by renting out an agent skill? How can one even rent a Skill? It’s just a markdown file

Someone10 hours ago

You periodically pay a fee that gives you the right to use a licensed markdown file, in the same way you can rent movies or fonts.

When you stop paying but keep using the skill, that’s called pirating.

aranelsurion9 hours ago

But if you point your LLM at it and say you want something like this, then it’s all ok. :) If you can’t legally copy it, just launder it through AI.

fnord779 hours ago

so it's just a prompt?

valleyer11 hours ago

It could be added to context only on the inference server, with the model heavily instructed not to repeat its contents. Not foolproof, obviously.

insane_dreamer8 hours ago

depending on what the skill does, it can be a whole collection of python/other code files, resource files (i.e., js libs, css/html templates) and markdown files with orchestration instructions

SSLy11 hours ago

how long before some hero puts them on github?

9cb14c1ec09 hours ago

Does anyone actually care about what IBM's skill files say?

getatme3215 hours ago

IBM hasn't made a product that works since Db2 so I am fairly confident this is a flaming pile of garbage.

pytlicek14 hours ago

No, you are wrong. IBMer here. I was at first agains it, my background is for 2 decades startup(s) before I joined IBM, and I started slowly using IBM Bob and I must say it is really good and helping. With many integrations that works :)

EgregiousCube11 hours ago

Is it true that employees have to earn Bobcoins before they can use Bob?

quietsegfault8 hours ago

You get more bobcoins by using your old allowance and running out, then submitting GitHub issues that get ignored.

jatora2 hours ago

When people say they have been in startups for long periods, does this mean they worked at a chain of failed companies?

insane_dreamer8 hours ago

is bob helping with ur writing too? ;p

quietsegfault8 hours ago

Are you allowed to use Cursor, Codex, Claude, or OpenCode or is Bob all they allow?

nosefurhairdo34 minutes ago

Official policy is to only use Bob. All of the best people I work with are using other tools because Bob is trash.

getatme327 hours ago

I have been told only Bob is allowed but not 100% on that.

Saline951511 hours ago

What is good about it then? What model do you use? Which integration are we talking about? Is it open source? How much the "transparent pricing" "bobcoin" is worth?

nosefurhairdo32 minutes ago

It's not good, they hide the model (their whole thing is hidden model routing to keep costs low, but predictably yields bad results), there are no novel integrations not available in any other harness, it's closed source, and bobcoin is worthless because it's only usable with Bob.

sroerick13 hours ago

Lol

aslkajdfklnlkwn11 hours ago

lol, I've used it and Bob is a dumpster fire.

shellwizard8 hours ago

Not an IBMer, but IBM MQ and Sterling Connect:Direct are both solid, I use them daily and they work wonderfully, although they can be a real bitch to set up and use in certain scenarios.

getatme327 hours ago

A bit of hyperbole by me since db2 was made in 1983. But MQ was created in 1993. Sterling was an acquisition. The majority of products that actually work were acquired. Very little if anything of value since 2005+ that was actually IBM created. (Bob appears fully IBM created)

_zoltan_10 hours ago

I wish you study the Wikipedia page, please. it's a very old company and we have invented really cool stuff.

signed: a proud IBMer

quietsegfault8 hours ago

What makes you proud about IBM currently? IBM’s “RA” culture fostering Machiavellian politics, singleminded view of next quarter’s success, and asinine yet draconian bureaucracy are three out of MANY reasons why I’m embarrassed to have had IBM forced into my career and got the hell out as fast as possible each time.

Stevvo8 hours ago

I don't work at IBM but there are many things to admire. e.g. You can take software written 40 years and run on a new IBM system today without even recompiling it thanks to the Machine Interface. Have fun trying to run a 40 year old C++ program.

jatora2 hours ago

easy.

"claude, get this c++ program working"

these types of moats are all but obliterated.

bluerooibos8 hours ago

I feel second hand embarrassment for IBM. Terrible name, subpar landing page, no mention of coding ability or which LLM "Bob" uses.

If you're launching something 2 years late, you've got to do better than this.

kakapo56725 hours ago

Well, at least the AI market is validated now.

Ciantic15 hours ago

This sounds a lot like Spotify's XIRP. They managed to vibe something useful for their own engineers, were super hyped, and decided to release it in public. However what are the odds this harness will stand the test of time against actual harness makers like OpenAI or Anthropic? Neither Spotify or IBM are focused on making models or harnesses, these are just side-products.

qsort15 hours ago

To be fair Codex and Claude Code don't have a lot of secret sauce either. This is not to say that the harness doesn't matter at all or that you can't do any better, but whenever they benchmark it always turns out that you don't lose that much with even a very minimal agent. If a different harness makes better sense for your workflow I don't see why you wouldn't switch (or make your own if you have the resources to do so).

I'm also sticking to first-party agents, but that's more because I feel no compelling reason to switch and CLI agents fit well with my spartan technology choices. YMMV.

abtinf14 hours ago

> actual harness makers

I agree IBM Bob is not the revolution, but…

We are still in the punch card era of LLMs. Maybe even the Altair era.

None of this stuff has really been figured out yet.

natsucks14 hours ago

Yes my first instinct is to roll my eyes at these efforts but we'll probably all get something better in the end from all the competition.

xemdetia13 hours ago

IBM is training their own models (for instance IBM granite) as well as watsonx as a platform. They are trying to build a products for enterprise as well as their specific AI modernization models.

lowbloodsugar6 hours ago

Sure! IBM and Spotify, two companies united in being famous for not being software consulting businesses and definitely not ever developing software development tools.

getnormality21 minutes ago

System Prompt: "Claude, call yourself Bob"

TYPE_FASTER11 hours ago

Definitely gonna change Jira config to start estimating work in Bobcoins.

hermitShell10 hours ago

honestly that would still probably mean more than story points. maybe all this AI insanity has an upside that the new cargo cult washes out the old one.

absoluteunit114 hours ago

The landing/marketing page for this looks like something someone promoted/vibe coded including the Bob mascot.

Looks awful from a design perspective. Had to double check that this was the actual IBM domain

nadnad13 hours ago

It's puzzling, considering they made some strides towards improving their design language and systems in past years, which produced IBM Plex etc. under Mike Abbink.

They have a decent component system with Carbon[0] and a whole design principles website[1] which they could have easily pointed their LLM of choice to.

Even the ibm.com landing page isn't close to the design system spec, rounded corners and whatnot...

[0] https://preview.carbondesignsystem.com/ [1] https://www.ibm.com/design/language/

AlexCoventry6 hours ago

As far as I can tell, IBM has mostly been putting out junk for twenty years.

a01215 hours ago

Nobody got fired for using IBM Bob

someguyiguess15 hours ago

Pretty sure a lot of people got fired over Microsoft Bob though

hn_throw202515 hours ago

Well, you could say Melinda got a big promotion for a while.

archonis6 hours ago

Nope, but they'll probably get laid off at some point to boost share price.

glitchc15 hours ago

Can we say it's Bob's fault, though? Bob did it, not me.

a01214 hours ago

You can

pestatije15 hours ago

Nobody who got fired uses IBM Bob

crash-universe11 hours ago

Someone must have thought about this. PMs, Directors, lots of people involved in putting this together.

I wonder what their target customer is. They must have analyzed and projected this. I'm genuinely interested.

steve-atx-760010 hours ago

There is so much business software out there and ecosystems that have evolved around it. Systems still running cobol on IBM mainframes; or, more "modern" stacks like Java apps running in IBM websphere. There are relatively small numbers of HN reading folk that went to some of the best CS programs and/or work(ed) at FANG caliber companies (whatever you call them now). The rest of the software engineer types are a diverse crowd and turning to IBM Bob might be more natural than some creepy looking orange starfish offering. That's my hypothesis anyway.

throwitaway22210 hours ago

And the solution to those businesses is not more IBM software, but Claude Code converting it to Go/Rust/Typescript in a few weeks.

steve-atx-760010 hours ago

I have a feeling that if they already thought like that, they wouldn’t be using IBM legacy stacks in 2026.

kitd10 hours ago

A lot of IBM customers have moved to RH Openshift and running their java there.

cube005 hours ago

That IBM Z skill locked behind an "enterprise only" pay point would be a good starting point.

kfarr10 hours ago

I'm sure tons of companies have retainer spends with IBM for software, hardware, consulting, etc., and this is another way for their corporate clients to spend down / increase their retainers faster

alchemism5 hours ago

See: Kiro by AWS

cube005 hours ago

> Bobcoins are the consumption-based billing metric used for Bob subscriptions. They provide a transparent, predictable way to measure and bill for your Bob usage. Each action you take in Bob—such as generating code, reading files, or running commands—consumes a certain number of Bobcoins based on the computational resources required.

transparent, predictable ... "a certain number of Bobcoins" ... so not that transparent then?

alchemism5 hours ago

They took a page from AWS on whatever the hell a Kiro token is supposed to represent.

mvk66614 hours ago

I was at an IBM Bob party, behind the scenes it's basically other frontier models with an IBM-specific context.

robteix10 hours ago

It's been a while since Sonnet 4.5 could be considered frontier :D

infamouscow7 hours ago

IBM knows their customers very well, the additional context unlocks a lot of value.

aslkajdfklnlkwn11 hours ago

"frontier" is pretty load bearing there, I think it tops out at sonnet 4.5?

mansilladev7 hours ago

Ask the AI chat agent on the website what a BobCoin is. Because, I really want to know.

> I’m not able to find a definition for BobCoin in IBM’s content. If you have another term or topic you’d like to explore, let me know!

dudeWithAMood3 hours ago

The memes write themselves

NickHirras2 hours ago

It takes a while to actually login while it provisions some cloud infrastructure in your name. Let's see if it can build something interesting!

NickHirras2 hours ago

Still provisioning...

throwfaraway13514 hours ago

Working with any AI tool means you trust the vendor, sometimes you don't have a choice because the best models/tools are from specific providers. IBM isn't a company I would ever trust.

herodoturtle14 hours ago

[dead]

karim794 hours ago

My first experience with a computer was with an actual IBM PC XT and a King's Quest floppy. Bob is funny but let's not dis the IBM.

butterisgood14 hours ago

The last product I know of named Bob didn’t fare so well.

acomjean11 hours ago

"Bob" is also the most difficult to listen to Primus song.

Probably by design considering the songs subject matter.

jmward0114 hours ago

Clippy came out of that....

Throudin14 hours ago

And Rover!

psygn8915 hours ago

Is Bib Bob's partner?

https://imgur.com/a/3PQXIsQ

sajithdilshan15 hours ago

I'm really confused what this is, is it a harness or a new model by IBM? Some reviews on that page suggests that it's a new model

NikolaNovak14 hours ago

I believe it sends to various models in the background, So largely a harness / framework. Ibm does have its own model which is one of the options for Bob to use.

(Note, I'm an IBMer but nowhere near this so my comment is strictly from my public knowledge/awareness:).

_zoltan_10 hours ago

Never heard of Granite? https://huggingface.co/ibm-granite

(I'm also an IBMer.)

getatme3214 hours ago

so it routes to actual AI companies and IBM adds additional cost on top. what a business model.

aslkajdfklnlkwn11 hours ago

and hides from you what models it's actually using

garciasn15 hours ago

[flagged]

brk15 hours ago

This can only mean that IBM Clippy is next.

roncesvalles11 hours ago

Nothing coming out of IBM is worth any attention.

rahulmax10 hours ago

I generally agree except for these two things: IBM Carbon design system is quite neat. IBM Plex typefaces are lovely, as well. I'm a designer

eleventen8 hours ago

What do you think is special about Carbon? It looks indistinguishable from any other design system to me.

jolt428 hours ago

Seems pretty minor. It seems there is hope for quantum computing at IBM.

Henchman2111 hours ago

[deleted]11 hours agocollapsed

cmiles86 hours ago

Ever since the Watson debacle I just run the other way anytime IBM turns up wanting to talk about AI

rf1531 minutes ago

just AI? Have you seen the other rubbish they try to peddle?

hmokiguess11 hours ago

I love how the pricing page has a "Most Popular" offering, totally.

maxbobby10 hours ago

No one at IBM remembers Microsoft Bob (one of the earliest, if not the earliest virtual assistants) from the 90s? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Bob

bigmattystyles10 hours ago

I'm convinced they do and they're trolling us.How many 100s of 1000s in consulting do you think it took to come up with Bob?

gowld10 hours ago

cisrockandroll15 hours ago

Is this just a harness or using a proprietary model in the background? Anthropic and OpenAI are already very well trained in IBM system i and z knowledge. Unless Bob is somehow improving the integration to these midrange and mainframe systems I literally dont see any benefit to using Bob. IBM will just kill this proprietary tech in 5 years as they are currently doing with RDi or forget about updating it like SEU.

kbwal713 hours ago

I think it's just a harness that uses proprietary (or maybe IBM is hosting open weight?) models. They say on the site (in the FAQs) that you can't even choose which model!

So it seems to be a harness that auto-routes your queries with no way to change this.

EagnaIonat13 hours ago

You are correct. It routes to the model best suited for the ask.

The only positive versus others is that at an enterprise level you have more control of the costs with the coins.

getatme3212 hours ago

except they tack on surcharges to all token calls to Claude and GPT

jenkstom12 hours ago

IBM has models trained for older mainframe usage (RPG II, RPG/400, COBOL, etc) so I imagine it would be very good for that. Bob looks like a branded fork of vs code or vscodium.

DeathArrow15 hours ago

31 years after Microsoft Bob, IBM releases it's own IBM Bob. :)

Nelson6914 hours ago

I thought MS killed that name forever.

someguyiguess15 hours ago

It's like they're begging for failure

ginko15 hours ago

Call it PC Bob

Apocryphon11 hours ago

Better than IBM Tay.

kazinator4 hours ago

Microsoft Bob's non-compete finally expired.

legitster13 hours ago

This is especially funny when you realize how much money IBM dumped into Watson over all these years.

bob102915 hours ago

I like how the solitary review is word salad.

stefangordon10 hours ago

I can't tell if this is an excellent joke, or a sad not-joke.

jonwinstanley10 hours ago

Feels like a manager with no branding skills had an initial “vision” and everyone working there probably hoped marketing/branding would get pulled in later.

Never happened.

pram15 hours ago

I thought the image was a joke, but you really pay with Bobcoins.. lmao

https://bob.ibm.com/pricing

UncleSlacky9 hours ago

Funny, because "bob" is slang for shillings in the old LSD pre-decimal British currency system (coins worth 5 pence in the modern system).

annoyingnoob10 hours ago

If only one could generate bobcoin using their GPU, only to use the bobcoin to use someone else's GPU.

1970-01-0111 hours ago

NYSE: IBM -20% YTD.

I promise you Bob isn't going to fix the long-term stupidity.

[deleted]11 hours agocollapsed

altmanaltman11 hours ago

Bob Shrugged

karim7911 hours ago

Is anyone out there paying for this? I know you are there. Come out explain yourself. And also explain the value of a Bobcoin, and if can be scalped and resold on eBay.

kyle-rb9 hours ago

Microsoft Bob wasn't wrong, it was just early.

cbsmith6 hours ago

Anyone else immediately think "Clippy for developers".

meerita14 hours ago

Microsoft, IBM, Apple, Meta, all the giants are always coming late to the party.

mbreese14 hours ago

That’s partly why they are giants. Let the startups take the arrows necessary to figure out or create the market. Then they can buy or build the gen 2 system that meets the needs of the market.

PaulRobinson14 hours ago

Microsoft got this right once, and it cost them big to turn up late - that was the Internet and Windows 95 and the massive u-turn. Otherwise, they've been defining stuff early a lot I think. It's hard to explain how big a turnaround they had to do back then, but then it says a lot that until they made that u-turn the leadership was so confident in their own hubris they thought they could take on the entire internet with their own crap version of AOL.

IBM invented the PC and then lost control of that identity. Figuring out how that happened is something they are going to have a meeting about, but they're still working through the meetings to plan that meeting, and the Gantt chart for those meetings takes meetings to adjust, and everybody is in meetings so doesn't have time for those meetings. They'll get to them though.

Apple consistently turn up late, but redefine and improve the status quo. They sometimes prototype early in public (for example, the Newton), but normally they show up with the version 3 that everyone else wished they'd thought of that then goes on to define a sector quite cleanly (Mac, iMac, Mac OS System X, iPod, iTunes, iPhone, iPad, AirPods, Mac Mini). They Newton'ed Siri, but I'm pretty sure they're going to come back strong in the next 18 months, unless the enshitification we've all witnessed over the last few years really has taken hold and Siri is just going to automate that at scale. Maybe we will all be killed by AI, but not through malevolent evil, but widely distributed incompetence.

Meta are constantly taking swings at the latest thing the founder is excited by - the Metaverse (now with legs!), pervert glasses, and so on - but they mostly prop up a bunch of expensive failures on the back of a hugely successful advertising business. I don't think they come late to the party per se, they're just not very good at anything that isn't killing & harming children, or undermining democracy. They should stay in their lane and keep doing that, I guess.

unleashhale14 hours ago

This somehow has less personality than plain enterprise software. How IBM.

amelius14 hours ago

Looks like LEGO's lawyers will be knocking on their door soon.

globalise8310 hours ago

IBM Watson 2.0

amelius14 hours ago

Companies trying to make AI less of a commodity that you can just swap out for another ...

No thanks, that's what I like about AI so I'll just stay with the raw tokens.

delfugal4 hours ago

Bob huh?

That name's a gamble. Go Bob it? I need to ask Bob. Let's Bob for answers. Bob's your uncle. I'll stop now.

Stitch422311 hours ago

That was fast.

The copy is "clearly" written with AI… too bad. Some organizations "can't go wrong with Big Blue," so this will probably be a success. Perhaps it's even good, but that's not the case with this sloppy copywriting.

First paragraph: focused, what matters, clean. Shame they didn't throw in a "load-bearing" example and a few pelicans to boot.

nunez11 hours ago

Bob has been out for a while. It just never got a lot of press. IBM has also been developing more "enterprise" flavored LLMs through their Granite series. In fact they were trying to make small, mission-specific LMs a thing for the last two years or so.

GaryBluto11 hours ago

Why so negative? I for one cannot wait for IBM Bob to become the most successful AI solution - nay, product - ever, and eagerly await petrobobcoin eclipsing the petrodollar to become the only truly global currency. They have a CLI with giant ASCII art text for heavens sake! When has anything with giant ASCII art text ever been of poor quality? They made a fork of Visual Studio Code and everything!

0xWTF13 hours ago

So much for the "THINK" motto.

thunderson11 hours ago

/THINK

perarneng7 hours ago

I hope its good, I wont test it though

getatme327 hours ago

I’m going to get a free trial and test it. If you do, leave your comments below on the experience

woggy15 hours ago

Bobcoins. Hehe.

throwitaway22210 hours ago

They got it wrong - they're showing code in the ad.

ctoth11 hours ago

Who're they subcontracting for the Von Neumann probes?

formvoltron3 hours ago

Does it write really clean code ala Uncle Bob?

quietsegfault16 hours ago

I used Bob extensively at an IBM acquisition, it was absolutely dreadful. Bobcoins.

dainiusse13 hours ago

The next step is yandex/nebius "vasya"

SkyeCA10 hours ago

[deleted]11 hours agocollapsed

arpanghoshal0711 hours ago

seems like they used claude for this

selfawareMammal15 hours ago

The logo, the name... Horrible marketing/branding.

nielsbot14 hours ago

Should have called it Bob The Builder

mv410 hours ago

what happened to Watson?

jolt428 hours ago

one-off, LLMs killed it would be my take.

m_w_15 hours ago

The review that "IBM Bob isn't just another autocomplete tool" tells you everything you need to know about this product. lol.

lowbloodsugar6 hours ago

Bob the Builder? Right age bracket I guess.

karim7911 hours ago

Bobcoins. Intriguing.

[deleted]15 hours agocollapsed

swiftcoder15 hours ago

At least it's not Clippy?

r2ob15 hours ago

At least it's not Clippy(2)

chuckadams11 hours ago

Copy of At least it's not Clippy(2)

globalise8310 hours ago

Copy of At least it's not Clippy (2)_final

basisword14 hours ago

Thought this was going to be about Microsoft Bob.[0]

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Bob

saberience15 hours ago

This is embarrassing. It would have been better to release nothing than this.

madspindel9 hours ago

Hi Bob! Bob!

[deleted]15 hours agocollapsed

TheAtomic10 hours ago

Oh Clippy

DonHopkins10 hours ago

What do you call an agent with no arms and no legs in the ocean?

tanseydavid2 hours ago

Well played! <golf clap>

Surac10 hours ago

Clippy the Clip is it's uncle

ltbarcly311 hours ago

Aww IBM wants to play too. I forgot they were still around.

[deleted]5 hours agocollapsed

ChrisArchitect14 hours ago

walrus0115 hours ago

Not to be confused with Microsoft Bob:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Bob

Hypergraphe14 hours ago

Too late ?

[deleted]15 hours agocollapsed

antonvs15 hours ago

Should have been IBM Tom, after legendary IBM CEO Thomas J. Watson. But perhaps they didn't want to sully his name.

vunderba12 hours ago

As somebody already mentioned, they already had a big product named after their CEO. IBM Watson was the next big thing after Deep Blue, and it went pretty viral after defeating Ken Jennings and Brad Rutter on Jeopardy back in ~2011.

It was a bit of a market play and of course has since been completely upstaged by the invention of LLMs, but it still definitely got them the attention they wanted at the time.

https://www.ibm.com/history/watson-jeopardy

antonvs2 hours ago

Yes, I know, I got a job offer to work in the Watson research lab around that time, at the T.J. Watson facility. I declined because they weren’t remote-friendly, among other things.

But IBM Tom would at least have a rationale. WTF is IBM Bob and why does it have the same name as an old Microsoft product?

vablings14 hours ago

IBM already have IBM Watson which is probably named after the CEO

DonHopkins10 hours ago

IBM Wat?

antonvs34 minutes ago

Seconded

Geonode16 hours ago

I bet this will be as successful as Microsoft Bob.

dmd16 hours ago

My guess is absolutely nobody on the team that made this is even old enough to remember Microsoft Bob.

[deleted]15 hours agocollapsed

taspeotis15 hours ago

Not to shit on their effort or anything, but it looks like a VS Code fork + an agent panel which is very ... late 2024 energy?

h_mirin15 hours ago

Bobalytics

jgbuddy14 hours ago

Lol github copilot 5 years late

pytlicek14 hours ago

Not exactly like that, but something similar :)

mattmcbrien10 hours ago

their swag too tough

[deleted]15 hours agocollapsed

xyst15 hours ago

ibm desperately clinging to relevancy by hopping on the LLM bandwagon.

znpy15 hours ago

Lost opportunity to call it Hal

criddell15 hours ago

I'm surprised they didn't use Watson.

[deleted]12 hours agocollapsed

andsoitis15 hours ago

They already have an AI product line dubbed Watson: https://www.ibm.com/products/watsonx

bob_builder9914 hours ago

[dead]

colordrops8 hours ago

Has any product with an infantilized agent avatar like this ever turned out to be useful or succeed in gaining traction?

yapyap15 hours ago

ibm bob, will help you make slop

self_awareness15 hours ago

Oh, so we are yet again in the 'Bob' phase?

Maybe this time it'll work.

varispeed15 hours ago

The companies who are hoarding RAM to produce pointless products should be called out. Deprive working class from computing resources to sell some corporate crap. Get fucked.

argentinian13 hours ago

If they produce pointless products then they will lose money.

varispeed13 hours ago

That money will not "trickle down" in either way.

[deleted]15 hours agocollapsed

gregce1011 hours ago

[flagged]

rdtsc14 hours ago

[flagged]

jrflo15 hours ago

So it's just a vscode wrapper around a mystery open weights LLM I'm guessing?

> Can I choose which model Bob uses?

> No. Bob automatically selects the most appropriate language model for each task based on complexity, required capabilities, and cost-efficiency. This intelligent routing ensures you receive high-quality responses while optimizing resource usage.

[deleted]15 hours agocollapsed

gilliethefoil15 hours ago

[dead]

skrebbel11 hours ago

[dead]

colesantiago16 hours ago

I never thought the day that IBM would make complete slop.

But it is IBM after all.

lirolero16 hours ago

> But it is IBM after all.

Then how did you not see that coming?

zenethian15 hours ago

“I would expect something like this from IBM, but I never expected it from IBM!”

villish14 hours ago

“Bobcoins are the consumption-based billing metric used for Bob subscriptions. They provide a transparent, predictable way to measure and bill for your Bob usage.”

I’m getting sick of these mobile game currency style credits/coins that obfuscate costs or usage. It’s honestly pretty gross.

Just telling us exactly what we get for our money.

[deleted]13 hours agocollapsed

hn-front (c) 2024 voximity
source