Hacker News

theanonymousone
I Stored a Website in a Favicon timwehrle.de

Tepix12 hours ago

Instead of going via pixels, why not use a SVG favicon and directly store markup inside it and extract it?

Use this favicon.svg:

    <svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg">
    <circle cx="50%" cy="50%" r="50%" fill="orange"/>
    <p>hello HN!</p>
    </svg>
use this in your <head> to use a svg favicon:

    <link id="favicon" rel="icon" href="favicon.svg" type="image/svg+xml">
finally, use this in your <body> to extract it and add it to your document body:

    <script>
    fetch(favicon.href).then(r => r.text()).then(t => document.body.innerHTML += t.match(/<p[\s\S]*p>/)[0]);
    </script>

montebicyclelo6 hours ago

"why not alternative", would be better framed as, "here's a fun variation" — because both approaches are just playing around with technology, for fun / curiosity / exploration. Storing in the pixels is a fun approach, resulting in something Rube Goldberg-esque.

weetii11 hours ago

Hey, yeah, I wrote the article. This (of course) would be more practical. Thanks for pointing it out. I wanted the payload to "live" in actual pixel data rather than hidden text inside an XML file. That’s why I went this way :)

cogman103 hours ago

If you wanted to play around and do something a little more challenging (though you'd be bulking up the javascript) then one thing you could do is play with a bespoke html compression. You could store the tags in 4 bits `0001` first bit, tag open or close, and the remaining 3 bits indicate which tag is being used (div/p/b/h1/etc). With at least one of the values like `0111` indicating text is following and another tag like `1111` indicating that an unsupported tag follows.

If you extend it out to 8 bits you can pretty nearly store all the html tags (it'd give you 256 tags to play with).

peter-m8011 hours ago

The ico file format allows multiple resolution icons, so a lot of data

weetii11 hours ago

Good point, I might add a section in the article where I list alternative approaches. Thanks

dodslaser23 minutes ago

Or just put the entire website in a <foreignObject> and render it in the favicon.

chrismorgan9 hours ago

Regular expressions? Ugh. Encode it properly as XML in the correct namespace, load it so, and take it from that.

Or just serve the SVG file and use <foreignObject> to embed the HTML, and include <link rel="icon" href=""> inside it. In theory you should be able to define a <view id="icon"> and use <link rel="icon" href="#icon">, but in practice neither Firefox nor Chromium seems to be handling that properly in a favicon, which is disappointing.

Tepix6 hours ago

It's a hack. A one-liner. Go crazy with it. Or touch grass ;-)

Oh yeah and favicon isn't part of the DOM.

reichstein8 hours ago

Just because it's my windmill to tilt at: `[\s\S]` can be written shorter and more precisely as `[^]`.

MomsAVoxell8 hours ago

[\s\S] vs. [^]

A quixotic windmill tilt if ever I saw one.

GoToRO8 hours ago

ai says [^] is not portable; I did not test it. Too bad, I'll stick to [\s\S].

spiesd5 hours ago

Too bad, indeed. It's well-defined in javascript (and thus, appropriate in this admittedly niche context). It's non-portable across different regex engines, yes.

berkes10 hours ago

An SVG can embed raster images: base64 encoded bytes.

So you could layer this experiment: favicon is svg, that contains encoded raster, whose bytes are encoded html.

At the very least it would make a mindboggling CTF step.

Retr0id6 hours ago

> You still need a tiny bootstrap loader to decode the image.

Nope, you can do it all in a single file with an html/png polyglot (and nowadays you can get better compression ratios with newer formats like webp).

https://web.archive.org/web/20120801001616/http://daeken.com...

gildas6 hours ago

You can even make the file compatible with ZIP (and PDF) on top of that, see https://github.com/gildas-lormeau/Polyglot-HTML-ZIP-PNG/raw/... (and https://github.com/gildas-lormeau/Polyglot-HTML-ZIP-PNG)

sheept12 hours ago

You can use the favicon cache as storage too, by redirecting users across domains. It's been proposed as a potential fingerprinting risk[0], and if a browser naively reuses the cache for incognito mode, it could be used to track users across browser profiles.

[0]: https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2021/02/browser-track...

koolala12 hours ago

Wasn't this fixed or mostly fixed?

[deleted]6 hours agocollapsed

ai_fry_ur_brain9 hours ago

My thoughts instinctively went to "this has to be being used for fingerprinting" when I read OPs blog. Are anti fingerprinting measures taking into account the use of the canvas api with favicons?

The link to the supercookie site is dead unfortunately.

Walf12 hours ago

PNG has comment chunks tEXt, zTXt, and iTXt. You can have a completely normal image whose file is stuffed with as much content as you want. That is less fun, I suppose.

weetii11 hours ago

Yes, that would also work, thanks for pointing it out

franciscop12 hours ago

Is this timing coincidence? I just submitted 1h (30 mins before this) ago a website I just made about storing your stock porfolio in a URL + favicon!

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48606396

Tagbert2 hours ago

Then there is this one. Seems to be a trend.

“Pong in S Favicon” https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48608681

esquivalience11 hours ago

I found the agressively staccato, clearly LLM-generated content extremely difficult to read.

k2enemy8 hours ago

Halfway through I was sure that there would be a reveal at the end of the article that the article itself was stored in the site's favicon, thus explaining the short, terse sentences. I was genuinely disappointed when I realized it wasn't. Missed opportunity!

benhill705 hours ago

I like the way it's written. I often write in a similar manner and I have never used LLMs to generate an writing for me. I have written exactly this way at work.

Too me, the author is just trying to get to the point. They know people start skimming if there is too much text.

SamBam3 hours ago

> The important catch

> The favicon doesn't actually contain the whole website itself.

This is the kind of thing that is extremely idiomatic LLM speak. There's nothing particularly wrong about it per se, but it just makes everyone who is familiar with LLMs say "oh, it's written by an AI" and it just becomes disappointing.

bstsb10 hours ago

for the first time in a while on HN, i disagree with the characterisation as AI-generated. at most it was drafted with an LLM, but the final output is pretty human to me.

they used the wrong it’s/its, made But. its own one-word sentence, didn’t capitalise HTML, and used “okayy” in parenthesis. all of this isn’t to criticise the writer - i enjoyed it more seeing these little imperfections that make up a blog post

fortuitous-frog8 hours ago

Looks largely AI-written, with some human edits: https://www.pangram.com/history/9afe7542-1085-4264-9691-2172...

FWIW -- I'm not as repulsed by it as the parent comment. But I do want to substantiate that it _is_ heavily LLM-written.

(If you're unfamiliar, Pangram has garnered a reputation as the leading LLM-detector, with a minimal rate of false positives; IME this has come with the tradeoff of being easy to manipulate/tweak your way into turning an LLM-generated piece of text into reporting a false negative, but for most folks that's worthwhile.)

darianvc8 hours ago

People do be having too much time...

Is the navigation of the site also AI generated? This doesn't make any sense and proves why these AI detectors don't work

MomsAVoxell8 hours ago

I have been writing for a long time, and using AI for as long as it was available to me, and I have noticed that I get accused of being an AI more and more - and I do not think that is because I am an AI, but because we are all being consumed with the AI mind-set, and thus the AI is taking over our thinking - so perhaps subconsciously, I am indeed formulating my thoughts in a more AI-centric manner, prompting the association across the vast distances of the internet by other human beings (- or, AI) of my conscious thought, with an artifice.

This is a banal insult, but it is also a dire warning wherever I see it - these days, people moaning about being AI may as well just be AI - automatic ignorance - but .. I do have to wonder.

Am I, AI?

istjohn4 hours ago

I found the writing engaging and enjoyable to read.

estetlinus11 hours ago

It’s the new internet. So, so annoying.

scottmcdot11 hours ago

Which bit? The short sentences?

bonoboTP5 hours ago

Not just the length but the structure, the way the headlines are phrased, the use of "honestly", the "not X but Y", many things cumulatively, not one particular thing in itself. If you work a lot with LLM writing, you notice. Same way you recognize the writing style of famous authors. It's never one particular thing but many.

bonoboTP5 hours ago

Agreed. Disappointing that more people don't notice it's AI.

noduerme11 hours ago

Yeah, but it's kinda weird. The typical LLM headers and bullet points are there, but it's like someone took an axe to the rest of the spew. I too would rather read someone's original bad writing than their bad editing of AI writing, but it's kinda interesting how this all shakes out.

netsharc9 hours ago

It doesn't seem to be LLM, but reads like one. The author is German, maybe it's a language expertise thing, maybe he likes the LLM style (unrelated to his nationality).

But yeah, sentences that only have 3-4 word each feel like 3rd grade writing; I couldn't read it.

weetii9 hours ago

Hey, I've always written like this. In school I couldn't stand subordinate clauses and long sentences because I'd lose my train of thought. But yea, I've noticed that people often find it hard to read so I'm going to work on that

SoMomentary5 hours ago

I actually feel the opposite of what most people are saying here. I thought your writing style was great. It felt like you respected my time as a reader and got to the fucking point.

I thought the lack of fluff was refreshing!

darianvc8 hours ago

You're good fr. People on here who try to make their day about being AI detectives. You're trying to work on it and that's what matters

cubefox6 hours ago

Did you use an LLM to write at least part of the article?

darianvc8 hours ago

Might stop using bullet points for not being flagged as AI lol

"Very small" -> yeah, this header is mostly AI generated. No hate against the author but this doesn't make any sense as header

bartvk11 hours ago

I wish people would include their prompts.

MomsAVoxell8 hours ago

Oh, I am so aligned with this mentality:

    A monitor is storage.

    A keyboard is storage.
Forum posts are storage. Markov-approved tweaks in an edit, over time, certainly enough for quite a lot of storage. Dual-use storage to boot, since .. you know .. sometimes the comments are socially interesting.

Best thing is, nobody really knows if their chicken casserole recipe isn't just a handle to a carefully constructed GUID pointing across to .. lets say, for humor .. a thousand different forum postings ...

I do have to wonder if the author is familiar with PoC||GTFO, for this is certainly a technique one will find deep within the depths of the Alchemist Owls' holy tomes...

drob5183 hours ago

Codes within codes. Wheels within wheels.

jorisw10 hours ago

Fun Fact: You can use any inline SVG for a favicon and keep it right in the HTML document.

This also allows you to use an emoji directly as a favicon, like so:

  <link
    rel="icon"
    type="image/svg+xml"
    href="data:image/svg+xml,<svg xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg' viewBox='0 0 100 100'><text y='.9em' font-size='90'>(your emoji here)</text></svg>"
  />
(HN isn't showing the emoji)

Timwi32 minutes ago

Just as a heads-up, if you do this and you want to use #rrggbb color codes or url(#id) links, you have to escape the # as %23, otherwise it gets parsed as a URL fragment and your SVG code is cut off there.

inglor8 hours ago

Cool! Here is a GH repo demonstrating unbounded favicons I made 11 years ago - it crashes some browsers - wanna guess how long it took each one to fix it :D https://github.com/benjamingr/favicon-bug

echoangle4 hours ago

> The length header is important because the image itself may contain unused pixels at the end. If there's no length value, there's no way to know where the real payload stops.

Not really, can’t you just pad with 0 bytes and stop reading when you encounter one that’s not part of the current Unicode codepoint?

zahlmanan hour ago

Zero bytes won't ever be part of a multi-byte character in UTF-8. They simply represent code point 0 (which is valid, but wouldn't appear in normal text) by themselves.

echoangle27 minutes ago

Ah even better so you can just use null terminated strings

divvsaxena4 hours ago

This is one of those projects that's completely impractical but makes the web more interesting. I love seeing people explore weird constraints just to see what's possible.

tetrisgm10 hours ago

Love it. Did you see the old effort to store the page in the url? https://github.com/jstrieb/urlpages

purple-leafy9 hours ago

That’s awesome. I took this a bit further a few years ago making a url only notepad quine that as you add data to it, creates itself. that can be saved as a bookmarklet. Have to watch the gif to understand

https://github.com/con-dog/serverless-architecture

berkes10 hours ago

I'd imagine the (aggressive) caching of the favicon by browsers makes it a challenge, but you could generate the favicon dynamically, then have JS extract the sequentially. Basically streaming arbitraily large content to a webpage via favicons. Via blocks of 239 bytes.

It may be a fun, novel way to proxy webpages that are otherwise blocked. Though, i guess, the service rendering the favicons can just as easily be blocked then.

Gabrys17 hours ago

Have an index.html that's also (byte-to-byte equal) served as favicon.ico. If that page "works" and the favicon doesn't show garbage, it is a website stored in a favicon (by my standards).

herodoturtle8 hours ago

How long before someone ports DOOM into a favicon? ^_^

(For the technical gurus here, would that even be possible?)

shakna8 hours ago

You can already play it in a favicon [0].

But as favicons can be svgs, and let you store foreign objects... You could store the whole thing in the favicon, but might also need a line of JS to extract it.

[0] https://vidferris.github.io/FaviconDoom/

drob5183 hours ago

3… 2… 1…

titularcomment8 hours ago

Painful read.

Related interesting project: https://github.com/EtherDream/web2img

brtkwr8 hours ago

Hmm this is cool but what are the practical use cases?

It didn’t load first time round on my browser (Brave) without disabling its prevent tracking feature…

MomsAVoxell8 hours ago

Practical use cases for stashing data in places people least expect it?

Wallet password.

New ecosystem for the kids.

That's two, at least.

momoraul7 hours ago

The browser already asks for the favicon on every page. Might as well put it to work.

franze6 hours ago

also https://pong-in-a-favicon.franzai.com/ for further favicon (mis)use

franze6 hours ago

superjose12 hours ago

Pretty cool tbh!!! Would have loved seeing the decoder code!!!

It's also pretty interesting to think how an attacker could exploit images on his behalf. Never thought that would be a way!!!

Thanks!

schobi12 hours ago

I guess the decoder is more than the 208 bytes that this page uses..

But maybe you can misuse this and store a session ID / cookie in a favicon (give everyone a unique one) and survive some cookie cleanup and evade privacy restrictions?

Maybe you can still make it that the favicon looks like an image a little to not raise suspicion?

Favicons seem to be cached across private browsing sessions. Oh no

RetroTechie9 hours ago

I'm tempted to think that only someone working for a company in the advertising industry could come up with that.

Must EVERYTHING be polluted by ad tech & privacy intrusions?

Izmaki9 hours ago

Wait 'til the author discovers that you can use ping (ICMP) to transfer data, too! :)

beardyw11 hours ago

I would have used a minimal service worker to unpack the web data and present it as if it were just a normal page being loaded.

soanvig11 hours ago

Honestly it didn't interest me, but I do remember from back in the days full websites rendered by a browser from... Empty files. https://mathiasbynens.be/notes/css-without-html

aaubry8 hours ago

A neat improvement would be to make the decoder into a bookmarklet. This would avoid the overhead of serving the script. Of course you would rely on the user having the bookmarklet installed, but when you serve HTML you also rely on the user having a web browser installed.

bozdemir12 hours ago

Very cool. I wonder is it possible to make a simple game with also leveraging the webassembly?

weetii11 hours ago

Yes, probably. I guess, you’d need a bigger favicon since the minimal Rust WASM binary is around 20KB+ (?)

alex_suzuki11 hours ago

You might find my tinkering useful: https://strich.io/blog/posts/embedding-webassembly-in-qrcode... A QR code isn’t much different from a favicon I guess. :)

laladrik11 hours ago

The link is 404

alex_suzuki2 hours ago

It’s not for me?

abc123abc1238 hours ago

Bravo Maestro! Wonderful performance! =)

frankzero8 hours ago

I personally won't do things this way, but this is really cool and I could see the applications already.

ab_wahab0111 hours ago

Fascinating concept! Thanks for sharing this!

fitsumbelay11 hours ago

very cool and interesting after reading just the title I wrongly assumed this would be about svg

neon_me10 hours ago

Is it cake? Game for devs.

scoot11 hours ago

Would have been more fun if the blogpost was rendered from the favicon.

charcircuit9 hours ago

You can literally just use the file itself as the favicon. There is no need to over complicate it.

cp index.html favicon.png

deemwar7 hours ago

looks good

jibal11 hours ago

Surprised that a minimal "website" only requires a small image = few pixels = few bytes to store it? Um, ok.

pradeep4jan hour ago

[flagged]

[deleted]10 hours agocollapsed

swordlucky6664 hours ago

[dead]

pizzaballs10 hours ago

[dead]

heroku8 hours ago

[dead]

anujshashimal9813 hours ago

[flagged]

shaharamir12 hours ago

Amazing!

fvckaigotohell5 hours ago

AI generated garbage. Blocked

hn-front (c) 2024 voximity
source