cosmos0072a minute ago
From Italy, https://www.gutenberg.org/ gives a 404 error and https://gutenberg.org/ opens a very official-looking page stating "police notice. This site is under judicial seizure" and references a sentence number: "criminal proceedings 52127/20 R.N.R.I. tribunal of Rome"
Any idea what's happening? I thought PG published public domain books...
JSeikoop4 hours ago
Hi! I'm one of the programmers at Gutenberg. We've been improving the site a lot over the past few months (and more is coming!). If you haven't visited the page recently, it's worth checking out again: https://www.gutenberg.org/
svat6 minutes ago
Have you considered having a detailed version history for each book (etext)? The process of submitting fixes to typos etc in books involves sending an email (https://www.gutenberg.org/help/errata.html) and although the last time I did this (2011) the fixes did get applied reasonably quickly (couple of days), it all felt a bit opaque. The version history could also include the project (usually PGDP correct?) the etext originated from; that way one would be able to compare against the actual page scans.
I have very mixed feelings about Standard Ebooks and would much prefer being able to use Project Gutenberg directly, but one good thing Standard Ebooks does is that every book has an associated git repository (on GitHub), so it's (in principle) possible to see a history of fixes to the text over time.
lucb1e21 minutes ago
Huh that's interesting: 4.5 seconds for the TCP handshake and an additional 9.2 seconds for the TLS handshake. Is this some kind of captcha, since most bots would disconnect before that, so if you complete it once then it knows you're good? (Until the bots catch on of course, but so long as it works it's relatively unintrusive and not discriminatory against uncommon client software (that is, non-Chrome/ium).) The rest of the requests were lightning fast
codys11 minutes ago
I think their site is just slow, potentially because more people than they are used to are trying to view it.
I was unable to load it initially (got an error from firefox) and had to re-attempt. Still slow if one forces a reload (shift-r, etc, to not use local cache).
jefurii2 hours ago
When I thought about Project Gutenberg I remembered that original brutalist non-design. The current site has been very tastefully updated but looks like it's still very accessible if you turn styles off. Great job!
JSeikoop2 hours ago
sadly HN doesn't have a "heart" emoji I could use :D
Wistar2 hours ago
♡
Falimonda4 hours ago
The book list elements on front page render as both horizontally and vertically scrollable divs on mobile - seems like an opportunity for improvement.
Keep up the good work!
JSeikoop4 hours ago
good feedback thanks! Doing an iteration on the homepage design is actually pretty high on the priority list. will keep your feedback in mind!
zamadatixan hour ago
Thanks for the free work! Project Gutenberg is nice to have :).
On the site I noticed the library boxes have roughly a single extra line causing a scrollbar to appear and the last line to be chopped off https://i.imgur.com/PQ8T0qc.png is there an issues/bug portal to properly submit these kinds of things?
xrd4 hours ago
Thank you for your work. This site is an international treasure.
excitednumber3 hours ago
Thank you for being one of the best places on the internet
ExtremisAndy3 hours ago
Oh, my! This does look nice. Thank you for your hard work!
JSeikoop3 hours ago
Thanks! We're currently working on a design update of the page of any specific book. Should be online soon (next 1-2 weeks or so)
freedomben2 hours ago
I can't say for project Gutenberg specifically, but in general a huge issue I see is OCR errors. What do you all do to address OCR?
gluejaran hour ago
Check out Distributed Proofreaders: https://pgdp.net
lapetitejort2 hours ago
I uploaded a PDF to archive.org that auto-OCRs with plenty of mistakes. I have found no way of updating the entire stack of documents produced. I wonder if Project Gutenberg is similar
smallnix3 hours ago
There's a minor bug with chrome in android where the menu will not close when you tap outside the menu or on the menu link/button
JSeikoop3 hours ago
I've messaged the guy who's best suited to fixing this. He'll be on it this weekend
JSeikoop3 hours ago
will open an "Issue" for it
shuvrojit3 hours ago
Great Work. Thank you. I'm also a programmer. If you are ever short on help, let me know. I would love to contribute.
JSeikoop3 hours ago
https://github.com/gutenbergtools
autocat3 and gutenbergsite are repos responsible for generating gutenberg.org
samcollins4 hours ago
Very cool! Do you have a recommended way for an agent to see an index of the books and epub links?
(I can’t quite tell if that’s an egregious abuse of the site or you’re perfectly fine to share without human eye balls hitting your www?)
jzs4 hours ago
Now i'm not associated with gutenberg in any form, but they do have a page for offline consumption:
https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/offline_catalogs.html
Perhaps you can find the information you are looking for there.
However if you plan on scraping or otherwise hitting them with a ton of traffic, consider at least to donate a good amount for the traffic you cause them. It ain't free after all.
JSeikoop4 hours ago
Donations are always appreciated ;)
kay_o4 hours ago
Check out https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/offline_catalogs.html
Don't hit the site with agent. The section furtherst bottom machine readable.
samcollins3 hours ago
Thanks for the answers! Found it:
> All Project Gutenberg metadata are available digitally in the XML/RDF format. This is updated daily (other than the legacy format mentioned below). Please use one of these files as input to a database or other tools you may be developing, instead of crawling or roboting the website.
And strongly consider a donation! (My addition)
https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/offline_catalogs.html#the-p...
JSeikoop4 hours ago
not yet, but that's not a bad idea imo. Dealing with Ai crawler traffic is definitely a challenge if that's what you were referring to.
gluejar2 hours ago
if what you want is all the text, please use the tarball or data files at https://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/feeds
ancientcatz4 hours ago
OPDS?
gluejar3 hours ago
OPDS 2.0 coming RSN. email us if you want to test. OPDS 0.x is currently available (not recommended) by adding .opds to the end of a url
e0d075b569cd4 hours ago
[flagged]
TimorousBestie2 hours ago
Wanna let you know you’re doing great work and you have my dream job, thanks to the team for everything!
JSeikoop2 hours ago
it's not my day job. PG is open-source. I'm "just" a contributor
TimorousBestie2 hours ago
Oh, right. That makes sense.
nomoreusernames2 hours ago
[dead]
BiraIgnacio3 hours ago
Thanks so much for the work you and your team do!
throw0101c4 hours ago
While PG has probably gotten a lot of use and growth with the growth/maintreaming of the Internet since the 1990s, (TIL) it started back in 1971:
> Michael S. Hart began Project Gutenberg in 1971 with the digitization of the United States Declaration of Independence.[5] Hart, a student at the University of Illinois, obtained access to a Xerox Sigma V mainframe computer in the university's Materials Research Lab. […] This computer was one of the 15 nodes on ARPANET, the computer network that would become the Internet. Hart believed one day the general public would be able to access computers and decided to make works of literature available in electronic form for free. […]
aksssan hour ago
"Project Gutenberg began in 1971 when Michael Hart was given an operator’s account with $100,000,000 of computer time in it by the operators of the Xerox Sigma V mainframe at the Materials Research Lab at the University of Illinois."
https://www.gutenberg.org/about/background/history_and_philo...
[deleted]3 hours agocollapsed
gluejar2 hours ago
wikipedians, please help update this article.
svat32 minutes ago
In what way? And from what sources? (Wikipedia as a tertiary source is supposed to be a summary of information present in reliable secondary sources — see for instance https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Based_upon. So if the information on the Wikipedia article is incomplete or out of date, where is the correct information available?)
mcdonje2 hours ago
Prescient
thangalinan hour ago
Project Gutenberg is a treasure trove, though many technical details defy automatic typesetting of its books. Standard Ebooks takes consistency to an unbelievable level. My post compares various sources of public domain books with an eye on typesetting:
https://dave.autonoma.ca/blog/2020/04/11/project-gutenberg-p...
Someone12344 hours ago
I'm surprised no eBook Reader vendor has a Project Gutenberg "Store." Where you can just browse Gutenberg, find a book, and just grab it down to the reader. Instead, they either are actively hostile (Kindle), or require the use of Calibre (which itself is good, it is just the friction).
horsawlarway3 hours ago
I've used https://standardebooks.org/ to pull nicely formatted Project Gutenberg books on any e-reader that supports a browser (in my case, Boox).
Technically, I can also just directly pull the epub from Project Gutenberg, but sometimes the formatting leaves a lot to be desired.
Once you get an e-reader that runs a semi-capable OS (ex - stock android, even an older version), it's hard to go back to something like a kindle.
robin_realaan hour ago
To be precise, the vast majority of SE is from Gutenberg, but we also source from Faded Page, Gutenberg Australia, Wikisource and occasionally do our own transcriptions.
everybodyknows2 hours ago
HTML editions from the two sites contrast interestingly:
https://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/1513/pg1513-images.html
https://standardebooks.org/ebooks/william-shakespeare/romeo-...
Each has its particular advantages relative to the other ...
svat2 hours ago
Curious, what are the advantages you see in each relative to the other?
Also one should probably compare the former to the single-page version on standardebooks: https://standardebooks.org/ebooks/william-shakespeare/romeo-...
JSeikoop3 hours ago
standardebooks.org is great!
WillAdams3 hours ago
Used to be one could sort of get that with the Project Librivox:
e-book app Gutebooks (in addition to their audio app), but it seems to have been deprecated (I'm no longer able to connect to the server on my copy (which I only got 'cause there was an in-app purchase to fund Project Librivox).
FWIW, Barnes & Noble has been plundering the public domain using a book composition/keying house in the Philippines to make their public domain books which they make available in their stores --- Amazon apparently has a similar setup for the Kindle Store:
https://www.amazon.com/Public-Domain-Books-Kindle-Store/s?k=...
Rather a shame that PG didn't monetize by putting their books up there pre-emptively.
dessimusan hour ago
>Barnes & Noble has been plundering the public domain using a book composition/keying house in the Philippines to make their public domain books which they make available in their stores
Why is it 'plundering' for B&N to print physical books, transport them to their brick-and-mortar stores to sell? There are real costs associated to doing so. It would not have zero cost for me to print and bind a copy myself at home.
[deleted]2 hours agocollapsed
JSeikoop2 hours ago
the way I see it PG is a labor of love. Bit odd if Barnes & Noble or whoever piggyback off it. But in the end - the more people read the books, the better.
WillAdams2 hours ago
It is a public good, and it would be appropos if corporations would support it directly rather than work at cross-purposes to it.
If Amazon is going to sell public domain texts, then it would make sense to source them from PG, and fund some money from those sales to the non-profit, similarly, they could then funnel reports of typos to PG for review and correction (it was a bit of a struggle the last time I tried to get a text corrected, and the project founder/director actually stepped in on my behalf).
JSeikoop2 hours ago
that would be great! Sadly I'm not very confident that that will actually happen ...
WillAdamsan hour ago
Needs new legislation where the commons/public domain have public benefit corporations appointed as the manager of said resource.
GaryBluto3 hours ago
Most of them offer their own paid storefronts and have a perverse incentive not to offer a large area full of free books.
JSeikoop3 hours ago
probably true. Maybe an true open-source eReader should exist.
WillAdams2 hours ago
Arguably
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=biz.bookdesign...
should ~~be~~ EDIT have been ENDEDIT opensource --- it does at least work to support Project Librivox (or at least that's my understanding)
Seems to no longer be available (see below)
JSeikoop2 hours ago
I'm getting "We're sorry, the requested URL was not found on this server." if I go to the link
WillAdamsan hour ago
I believe the app is discontinued and the reason I can see the page is that I am on record as having downloaded it.
JSeikoop3 hours ago
I've heard that the newest Kobo e-readers have a browser that you could use to go to gutenberg.org and directly download files.
but yes, generally I agree with your point. Library of 75k books seems pretty valuable to have direct access to.
daveoc643 hours ago
You can download books directly from the Project Gutenberg website using the web browser on most eBook readers - even the Kindle supports it.
cstever3 hours ago
No money for them.
gluejar3 hours ago
Nice to see so much appreciation for what we do. (I'm the new-ish executive director.) Any wikipedians reading this, the article about PG is... aging. Last I looked, it said we offered Plucker files. @Jseiko has done some nice work.
fmajid2 hours ago
Worth mentioning the Project Gutenberg ZIMs. You can download the entire ENglish Gutenberg corpus for about 60GB (English Wikipedia ZIM complete with images is ~120GB):
JKCalhoun3 hours ago
Project Gutenberg had (has?) a tendency toward plaintext that always put me off. (And it has been over a decade I'm sure since I explored the site—so I am no doubt now misinformed.)
I like a styled formatted book—would prefer PDFs. (I know, not a popular format apparently.)
I like the idea of Project Gutenberg but guess I found book scans on archive.org my preference.
My go-to example is Lewis Carroll's "Through the Looking Glass" with the fantastic art of John Tenniel and Carroll's sometimes creative formatting of the prose…
I see they (Project Gutenberg) have ePub now, which can be good if well done.
(If not well done it can be a kind of mess. Re-flowable "HTML", paginated… Anyone ever try to print a long web page and did you enjoy the result? Perhaps that is as much on the ePub reader though.)
JSeikoop3 hours ago
We're supporting EPUB3 for the vast majority of books! At the same time we also have a "Plain Text" version for each as in a sense it's the most robust. PdFs are in the works!
JKCalhoun2 minutes ago
That's cool. I'll have to read up on EPUB3—I'm not familiar with it.
(I worked on iBooks for the Mac like 15 years ago—it's where I got to dive into the ePub format. A lot has changed in the standard since I am sure.)
JLO643 hours ago
As others here have mentioned, https://standardebooks.org/ is excellent and my understanding is that they use Gutenberg books as a source for theirs but done up much nicer.
everybodyknows3 hours ago
You can contribute to Standard Ebooks by finding OCR errors, then pushing your fixes to https://github.com/standardebooks
dempedempe3 hours ago
Source can be anything with the original text, but, more often than not, ends up being PG.
RattlesnakeJake3 hours ago
Check out Standard eBooks. They take the text from Gutenberg and add a level of polish to the ePubs.
jiffygist3 hours ago
I on the other hand prefer epubs for fiction. I mostly read on the phone.
skrtskrt3 hours ago
The common issue with PDFs is that e-readers generally have terrible support for them.
gluejar3 hours ago
PDF coming this year.
graemep3 hours ago
I have got quite a few books over the years from Gutenberg, and the epubs have been fine 0 even of illustrated ones.
the_af3 hours ago
I like plain text. You can always post process it into any other format you prefer.
JSeikoop2 hours ago
it's also very "accessible" - good for assistive technologies and people with "ou-of-the-ordinary" requirements
ssgodderidge2 hours ago
Looks like the top downloaded book yesterday[0] was Concrete Construction: Methods and Costs by Gillette and Hill.[1] Beat out Moby Dick, Count of Monte Cristo, Frankenstien, Romeo and Juliet, and others.
> 23644 downloads in the last 30 days.
I wonder if this is bot behavior? 23k downloads feels like a lot?
[0] https://www.gutenberg.org/browse/scores/top [1] https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/24855
sovietswag2 hours ago
Haha well there is an exciting movie about concrete coming out, “The History of Concrete” by John Wilson. Surely the superfans are studying up
JSeikoop2 hours ago
bot traffic would be my guess too. I doubt there was a sudden global spike in interest in "Concrete Construction Methods" :D
kreyenborgi3 hours ago
Gutenberg is awesome. There is also
https://www.fadedpage.com/ from Canada I think
https://runeberg.org/ from Sweden
cold_toman hour ago
Project Gutenberg feels like the opposite of modern internet design philosophy. Quiet, useful, accessible, and built to last.
Myzel39432 minutes ago
I wonder if the people behind project Gutenberg use Anna's Archive or mam for books that can't be put on Gutenberg.
ndr423 hours ago
The project was geo-blocked in Germany for a long time: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29024039
debo_an hour ago
Project Gesperrtberg
JSeikoop2 hours ago
very glad this has been resolved (I'm from Germany myself)
RattlesnakeJake3 hours ago
As a Kindle user, I still miss the old version of the site. The new one looks great on normal desktop, but the old one was simple enough to load and directly download books on the device's built-in browser.
JSeikoop3 hours ago
That's interesting. What about the new design prevents you from doing it? Genuinely asking here. We may fix it if it's actionable
RattlesnakeJake3 hours ago
And now it's time to put my foot in my mouth. I haven't used it in a while because it was frustrating, but you guys seem to have already fixed it :)
The previous version of the site had two major flaws:
1. The search bar had been removed from the top of the page, and hidden behind a "Click here to search" (or similar) link partway down the page
2. Once you opened that page, the coloring of the site was so washed out on e-ink that the text input was hard to find.
Thanks for fixing it!
JSeikoop3 hours ago
"you guys seem to have already fixed it" - that's what we like to hear :)
graemep3 hours ago
Is that a Kindle issue?
You can download books in most browsers. I know Amazon have done things to make life difficult for other stores in the past.
RattlesnakeJake22 minutes ago
I'd call it one of those middle-ground things:
• On the one hand, E Ink devices have a fairly known set of limitations, and it would be ridiculous for me to expect them to render the whole web well.
• On the other hand, it's good for website designs to consider the kind of devices employed by their users. Using a Kindle to access Gutenberg is likely less of an edge case than it would be for other sites, so it's worth the extra design work.
(Keep in mind that -- given my sibling comment -- this is all theoretical. The latest iteration of Gutenberg's site is much better than the previous version)
smilespray2 hours ago
I remember printing out project Gutenberg books in the mid-90s, four regular pages to an A4 page, double-sided on my inkjet. I had a background in typography, so I made it work.
Any yes, the text needed a lot of processing to make it right.
Now, in my early fifties and with declining eyesight, that's out of reach now.
Thanks for sticking with the project!
JSeikoop2 hours ago
that's cool! one of my "pet-ideas" is actually to make an AI-agent that does all that typographical work for any PG book to make it nicely printable without any manual labor whatsoever. Maybe that's doable now ...
smilespray2 hours ago
That is doable. Most of my work was regexp and repetitive stuff. And the typograhpy stuff is achievable with the current state of the art models. Not that I remember what I did, it was 30 years ago.
JSeikoopan hour ago
Interesting!
seizethecheese4 hours ago
A big pet peeve of mine with Project Gutenberg was the lack of mobile styling. Looks like it’s been fixed! Awesome.
JSeikoop4 hours ago
good to hear - that was a lot of work!
elias123340 minutes ago
I thought this was for the Wordpress Gutenberg Editor for a second
mowmiatlas4 hours ago
Made an app that allows reading PG books as audiobooks on iPhone https://loudreader.io/
JSeikoop4 hours ago
that's cool!
aronhegedus3 hours ago
Recently downloaded Moby Dick from here:) very easy to use
JSeikoop3 hours ago
Moby Dick is consistently one of the Top Downloads
oidar3 hours ago
I'm slightly curious how PG handles heavily illustrated books. I've downloaded some years ago, and the quality of the illustrations was always pretty poor. Has it been improved lately? What's the QA like for illustrations?
gluejar2 hours ago
Nowadays we depend on scans from Internet Archive, Hathitrust, and other sources. Some scans are better than others. Bear in mind that our illustrations need to be in the public domain and usually from the same edition as the text. https://www.gutenberg.org/help/errata.html
autoexec2 hours ago
I love how usable the site is even with JS disabled!
bryankaplan3 hours ago
I find it interesting that the context of this comments page apparently overrides the normal definition of “PG” on HN.
JSeikoop3 hours ago
:D
JSeikoop3 hours ago
personally I'm a fan of the other "PG" as well.
AndrewStephens3 hours ago
PG remains one of the best things on the internet. The amount of fascinating material almost beggers belief.
JSeikoop3 hours ago
the amount of weird/interesting stuff that one would find nowhere else is possibly the coolest aspect of PG imo
jwpapi2 hours ago
Please give me some book recommendations :)
JSeikoop2 hours ago
Flatland: https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/search/?query=flatland
I've heard good things. Also - Sherlock Holmes :)
klondike_klive2 hours ago
Not a recommendation per se but I used to use Amphetype on Gutenberg texts to practise touch-typing. There's something about writing out a book that hits differently to reading it. You skip less, odd parts stick with you. I think the last one I tried was The Island of Dr Moreau.
jwpapian hour ago
Ulnar Nerve Entrapement :/
BaseBaal35 minutes ago
From the newest releases page I stumbled into "Some Nigerian fertility cults" by Percy Amaury Talbot & am enjoying it so far.
carlosjobim3 hours ago
Their feeds of new books is a goldmine:
https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/feeds.html
Every day you'll get much more than you're bargaining for, right into your feed or inbox. Easy download books you're interested in and put them on your Kindle.
WillAdams3 hours ago
I used to use the Online Books Page new books listing similarly:
monegator2 hours ago
I keep getting PR_CONNECT_RESET_ERROR
JSeikoopan hour ago
just heard back that the server provider has been doing a security update. Maybe you were one of the users that got unlucky as a result... maybe try later if still interested
JSeikoop2 hours ago
I've reported it.
kgwxd2 hours ago
How did "Concrete Construction: Methods and Costs" come to be the #1 download?
JSeikoop2 hours ago
good question. first though - maybe some bot has downloaded it often for whatever reasons and our systems didn't detect it as bot traffic. just a guess.
taubek4 hours ago
Thank you for reminding me about this project. Didn’t visit it in a long time.
Timixxan hour ago
1
solarity_studio4 hours ago
Awesome
brcmthrowaway3 hours ago
I can't read anymore due to fear of not being productive with AI
JSeikoop3 hours ago
maybe there's a way to read more productively using AI: https://x.com/karpathy/status/1990577951671509438
could be a trick to ease that fear :D
zozbot2342 hours ago
I've found that the larger open-weight AI models do a great job of explaining the old non-fiction content on PG, particularly magazine articles which are a good size for the AI to handle. It breaks down the long wall-of-text paragraphs for you and explains all the historically relevant background that would've been assumed to be known back in the day.
If you ask it to assess the relevance of the text in the present day it will also do that very nicely, highlighting the places where the text shows old-fashioned viewpoints that would be sharply criticized today.
JSeikoop2 hours ago
so maybe Karpathy has a point that LLM-assisted reading should be a thing. Would be cool if that worked on E-Reader screens as well. Maybe when the browsers on E-Readers become good enough ...