hdersch30 minutes ago
I wonder how this compares to purely vision-based systems which use nothing but the images themselves for stabilization. Here are some quite old results of stabilization using image-based 3d-reconstruction of the scene which I wrote more than 10years ago, compared with other stabilization programs of that time (Deshaker, Adobe After Effects, Youtube). With todays improved hardware and progress in 3d-algorithms you may not need any additional gyroscopic data.
FrostKiwian hour ago
So So useful <3 Stabilization = you have to zoom-in, loss of FOV. Depending on Action Cam and undistortion parameters, this can be different, sometimes too little, sometimes too much. Gyroflow allows you to dial it in. Lot's Stabilization in a particularly shaky spot and widest FOV everywhere else, smoothed between to be unnoticeable.
po1nt2 hours ago
As a drone pilot I used this before davinci studio implemented something similar. I highly recommend.
rixed2 hours ago
How is this different from usual sensor stabilisation techniques? Is it because it can adjust for a wider range of motion?
Gigachad2 hours ago
Normal sensor stabilization only moves a tiny amount, It's more useful for photography for reducing micro jitters to get sharp photos. For video you need much more aggressive cropping and warping to undo the massive shake of walking with the camera.
Gigachad4 hours ago
I wanted to try this but sadly it seems my A7 iii doesn't record gyro data.
Zanfa2 hours ago
There are external devices that can be attached to the camera to record gyro data, e.g https://docs.gyroflow.xyz/app/advanced-usage/using-external-... I just ordered one a few weeks ago and haven't received it yet, so can't talk about personal experience, but there's no technical reason it couldn't work well.
nnevatie2 hours ago
My a7CR seems to be supported - will try this out later.
jauntywundrkind3 hours ago
That this also helps so much with rolling shutter correction is wild! Epic.
nerderloo3 hours ago
Such a fine piece of software.