Hacker News

vermaden
150 MB Minimal FreeBSD Installation vermaden.wordpress.com

aforwardslash6 hours ago

Vaguely related, FreeBSD has a tool to generate custom small footprint variants, called nanobsd - https://man.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=nanobsd&sektion=8&...

paffdragon5 hours ago

Thanks for mentioning this, I am just beginning my FreeBSD journey and wanted to setup a small pre-boot env with mfsBSD[1], didn't know FreeBSD has a tool already to do something like that.

[1]: https://github.com/mmatuska/mfsbsd

ggman hour ago

Do the same for X! Well.. a layered addition maybe. I've always felt it's bringing swags of stuff which never gets used. A non accelerated fb or vesa binding would do for a lot of things.

I liked this piece a lot. Nice write up of how you explored the space.

vermadenop26 minutes ago

Thank You :)

    > Do the same for X!
I kinda did ... but for RAM usage and not disk space.

Details here:

- https://vermaden.wordpress.com/2026/01/18/200-mb-ram-freebsd...

haunter4 hours ago

In there an “accessible” BSD on the level of live CD Linux distros, like Debian? Hey you can play around but also install it if you want right here right now with a DE

vermadenop3 hours ago

GhostBSD is FreeBSD with GUI installer and MATE by default - it also comes with XFCE flavor.

Highly recommended.

nazgulsenpai2 hours ago

I haven't checked out GhostBSD's site in a while, and saw they had a version with a DE called "Gershwin" I've never heard of before. It looks really cool for those Apple folk among us https://github.com/gershwin-desktop/gershwin-desktop

Forgeties79an hour ago

Oh wow I love that look! Might have to check this out as well.

haunter2 hours ago

Thanks exactly what I was looking for

seanw4444 hours ago

I'd be interested to know too. I haven't seen one, but that's probably because the majority of the BSD demographic is for servers and such, which are mostly all headless.

paulryanrogers4 hours ago

Ghost BSD?

JPLeRouzic3 hours ago

I switched from Devuan (Debian without SystemD) to GhostBSD a few weeks ago. Until now it seems a very pleasant travel, even bringing back nice memories of Unix in the 1990 while using all the modern tools.

Zambyte2 hours ago

I suspect English is not your first language based on your profile and I'd like to give a tip: "until now" implies that what follows is no longer true, due to a recent event that changed it. "So far" is probably closer to what you wanted, which expresses that it's still true, but based on limited time / experience.

[deleted]4 hours agocollapsed

yjftsjthsd-h4 hours ago

> Also keep in mind that You have entire static FreeBSD Rescue System available under /rescue dir.

If you have ZFS with boot environments, how valuable is that?

vermadenop3 hours ago

I always like to have options - with /rescue you have statically linked bectl(8) and zpool(8) and zfs(8) commands - which help to manage ZFS and ZFS Boot Environments.

cperciva2 hours ago

You can access /rescue without rebooting, for one thing.

crest5 hours ago

Wait until you run `pkg upgrade` and it takes several times the 150MiB...

vermadenop3 hours ago

Please read entire article (or at least skim read it) because I also cover that part :)

hn-front (c) 2024 voximity
source