gnabgib18 hours ago
Posted > 30 times, popular in:
~2023 (38 points, 8 comments) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34952741
~2022 (11 points, 10 comments) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31335495
~2015 (31 points, 10 comments) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8842118
2012 (208 points, 130 comments) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4435547
theandrewbailey18 hours ago
I'm astounded how they can shove so many features and so much performance in such a tiny framework!
ItsBob14 hours ago
I really wish this wasn't called Vanilla JavaScript... that's what I call actual JavaScript, you know, the language without libraries!
I don't normally feel strongly one way or the other about stuff but this really rips my knitting!
Note: Credit to the creators for making something and puting it out there but man, that name :(
wunderlab7 hours ago
can't decide whether trolling or irony
ItsBob5 hours ago
Haha, not trolling.
I tend not to use libraries for JS, preferring to write actual vanilla JavaScript, hence the reason the name rubs me up the wrong way :)
anghunk16 hours ago
yeah，i like