Hacker News

etherio
Show HN: Quibbler – A critic for your coding agent that learns what you want github.com

p0w3n3d18 hours ago

In other words, the Quibbler siphons wrackspurts away from your code.

janpio16 hours ago

The demo video in the GH page didn't work for me, but there is also one on Twitter/X: https://xcancel.com/fulcrumML/status/1984054489851310191

gexlaa day ago

More explanation here that I found by Googling around. Though not sure it has more info than the Github page.

https://fulcrumresearch.ai/2025/10/22/introducing-orchestra-...

nberkman12 hours ago

Submitted a PR with AWS Bedrock support: https://github.com/fulcrumresearch/quibbler/pull/5/files (credits!)

agarttha8 hours ago

Replace the middle manager

balleddog17 hours ago

Is an anthropic api key really necessary? A major roadblock for taking a test drive. Already have a Claud Max subscription but an anthropic api key still need at least 5$/mon extra.

epiccoleman12 hours ago

I really want Anthropic to let me make an API token that pulls from the same pool of usage that my Pro subscription does with the official clients. It would be cool to be able to run experiments with alternate clients and automation and stuff without having to go swipe the card at the ol' API token refilling station.

asn015 hours ago

You could use the prompts in the code to create a Claude Code sub-agent[1], which would do the same thing without an API key

1. https://docs.claude.com/en/docs/claude-code/sub-agents

thenthenthen16 hours ago

Sounds like video streaming services…

selfawareMammal18 hours ago

An agent's agent?

oneandonley112 hours ago

Sounds like a wip to me, "do it better or get punished"

hikarudo17 hours ago

A gentleman's gentleman!

etherioopa day ago

hey HN! happy to answer any questions

this kind of tool is especially useful in longer running tasks to enforce your intent without having to check in on your agent all the time

anonymous90821321 hours ago

Can users stack Quibblers, so Quibbler 2 corrects Quibbler 1 if, say, it fabricates an issue in the code it's reviewing? If so, have you found an optimum number of Quibblers for the Quibbler stack? Also, might users form a Quibbler council such that multiple Quibblers review the same thing and form a consensus before proceeding?

Balinares18 hours ago

I love the pixel-perfect precision with which this comment is straddling the Poe's Law line.

That aside I also love the concept of Quibbler Council and I'd get a kick out of seeing it in action.

sheepscreek14 hours ago

MoQs - Mixture of Quibblers? Would be convenient to have them run on dedicated FGPAs. Then they can facilitate near real-time quibbing at the network level across all packets.

mouse_14 hours ago

There's so many agents to handle my agents, I'm gonna need agents for my agent agents soon.

anonymous90821321 hours ago

But who polices the vibe police?

Brajeshwar20 hours ago

“Well, who’s gonna monitor the monitors of the monitors?” — Enemy of the State (Movie)

qq6621 hours ago

> We’ve found Quibbler useful in preventing agents from: 1) fabricating results without running commands

What a world we've created for ourselves

N_Lens19 hours ago

Next step is critics for the critics.

CoastalCoder15 hours ago

Until they reach critical mass.

[deleted]a day agocollapsed

cjonasa day ago

Vibeception

hn-front (c) 2024 voximity
source