Hacker News

eh8
Binary Wordle wordle.chengeric.com

AmsterErdo4 days ago

I think I don't get it... since it's binary, it can always be guessed in two attempts?

gamerDude4 days ago

It took me 10 tries...

cookie_monsta4 days ago

The classics are classics for a reason

financypants4 days ago

That's pretty good, considering they give you 110 tries

joseph_scott3 days ago

+1

williamdclt4 days ago

I _think_ it's humorous!

awwaiid4 days ago

Yes. You can still try to get it in one attempt.

brookst4 days ago

Odds in one attempt: 1 in 32

Odds in two attempts: 1 in 1

dskloet3 days ago

Your odds add up to more than 1.

pteetor3 days ago

Probabilities sum to 1.0. Odds don't sum.

tonmoy3 days ago

Odds of getting it within 2 attempts is 1. Odds of getting it on exactly the second attempt is 31/32

xandrius3 days ago

Ooops:

You won!

You guessed 01111 in 4 attempts!

brookst3 days ago

Well yeah and a fair coin has P(heads) == P(tails) == 0 for someone who eats it.

[deleted]4 days agocollapsed

sashank_15093 days ago

I’m glad I figured that out after my first attempt. I feel smart lol.

tylerchr4 days ago

My wife took one look at this and said “It’s not Wordle if it’s all binary—it’s Digitle.”

layer84 days ago

selcuka4 days ago

5 bits would be a weird size for a word.

flysand73 days ago

Knuth's "Art of Programming" had a hypothetical machine with 5-bit words.

layer84 days ago

I don’t think the parent’s argument would change if he had made an 8-bit Wordle.

badc0ffee3 days ago

Baudotle

HPsquared4 days ago

Reminds me of the idea of analogue cheese - fake cheese. It's analogue cheese until you get some on your fingers, when it becomes digital cheese.

gowld3 days ago

It's not Wordle because because it's only 5 bits. There are no remotely common 5-bit word systems.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Word_(computer_architecture)#T...

igitur4 days ago

I'm waiting for the NY Times to sue this one too.[1]

[1] https://apnews.com/article/new-york-times-wordle-clones-take...

umvi4 days ago

Binary is too easy, but hex can be tricky. I made a hex-based wordle puzzle for my programming game where you have to guess an 8-digit hex string in as few as 6-12 guesses using wordle mechanics... called the level "dwordle" :)

(video from like 3 years ago: https://www.reddit.com/r/Unity2D/comments/sq4anb/i_added_a_w...)

charly1873 days ago

Someone should make a base-26 version! It would probably be super popular!

Aissen4 days ago

I love that someone went all the way to write and publish this joke. Keep hacking!

gowld3 days ago

1 minute and 2 1-sentence prompts: https://g.co/gemini/share/a14f3f1b1c1c

Gemini self-improved version (added the "Hint" and "What could it mean?" features): https://g.co/gemini/share/05c8cce3b2ff

Aissen3 days ago

Nice, it seems the share links don't show the prompts (or I missed it); could you share them please?

asimovDev4 days ago

https://horsle.glitch.me reminds me of this

tetris114 days ago

quite difficult, there aren't many horse anagrams

wongogue4 days ago

My trick is to use HORSE as the starting word.

jshprentz3 days ago

SHORE

patrakov4 days ago

Step 1: Guess 00000.

Step 2: Replace all grey cells with 1s.

0xAFFFF4 days ago

This is obviously improper. The valid strategy for this game unfolds as follows.

Step 1: Guess 11111.

Step 2: Replace all grey cells with 0s.

Thank you for your careful consideration.

nmeofthestate4 days ago

If you start with 0's you save a small amount of electricity. 1's use up more electricity - any electronic engineer will agree.

justsid3 days ago

Not to ruin a joke, but does it actually make a difference for SRAM? It’s two inverters in a loop, despite not being the same size they are active components. But I’m also a software guy so I could be totally wrong.

dskloet3 days ago

I think displaying black or white pixels makes a bigger difference.

bdcs3 days ago

> does it actually make a difference for SRAM?

I have no idea in practice. But for the thermodynamic limit of actually making a difference, any irreversible change requires heat to be generated, e.g. initializing to zero, truncating, or bitshifts with discarded information. In contrast, addition/subtraction/multiplication/bitshifts without over-/under- flow will not necessarily generate heat.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Landauer%27s_principle

PS. you can also use mass-energy equivalence to extend this to calculate the lower limit of mass for a given quantity of information. TL;DR: The internet weighs 50g https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WaUzu-iksi8

heckelson4 days ago

And for a second, I was proud that I solved mine in 3 steps...

[deleted]4 days agocollapsed

paxys4 days ago

Step 1: Guess anything

Step 2: Flip all the non green cells.

underlines4 days ago

afaik, guessing anything not 00000 or 11111 at first step will lead to an optimum strategy of 3 steps. because you introduce possible "right digit at wrong place" as a third state.

guessing 00000 or 11111 removes that third state and leaves you with simple substitution of wrong cells, which leads to an optimal 2 step strategy.

but obviously the shortest strategy is just guessing it right on the first try :D lol

paxys4 days ago

It doesn't matter.

Right digit at the wrong place = wrong digit = you should flip it.

This puzzle won't take more than 2 guesses no matter what you input the first time.

Jtsummers4 days ago

It's still two steps. You only ever need to flip wrong digits.

jesse__4 days ago

I think it's actually possible to win on the second guess with any initial input. Or at least I did it a handful of times..

vikingerik4 days ago

This should be correct. For any cell that isn't green after your first guess, there's only one other possibility for its value.

dskloet3 days ago

It's not guaranteed you will always win in 2 steps because occasionally you will win in 1 step.

Supermancho3 days ago

Isn't 1 within the bounds of 2?

Sohcahtoa823 days ago

There's a difference between "in 2 steps" and "within 2 steps".

Supermancho3 days ago

Splitting hairs seems like grammar policing. I can even see action 1 and null action if I squint hard enough.

selcuka4 days ago

Yes. Yellow and grey mean exactly the same thing in this game: Flip it.

IAmBroom4 days ago

Hoping that you are being sarcastic...

petra3034 days ago

Yea, you don’t need more than two chances.

bbassett4 days ago

and now we know how raid parity works

topato4 days ago

This is some how the most concise description of parity ever

stavros4 days ago

gus_massa4 days ago

I solved it in one attempt! https://imgur.com/a/jklkc7F

Spoiler alert: There is a nice video by Captain Disillusion https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ou7KSmfC3lA (the relevant part is https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ou7KSmfC3lA&t=275s )

a3w4 days ago

I think I saw a two.

There is no such thing as a two, Bender!

freedomben3 days ago

There should be a 1 in 1,000 chance that a two slips in to one of the puzzles, and then can't be reproduced.

layer84 days ago

Sesse__4 days ago

I intended this strategy, but 00000 happened to be correct, so I didn't even need a step 2.

arjvik4 days ago

Came here to present my strategy for solving it in two tries, and realized it was far more complicated! (started with 00011)

zck3 days ago

I also made some number-based wordle-variants, which I call "numberdle". I found that it was hard to come up with good ways of guessing because wordle has the restriction that most combinations are invalid. You won't ever have to guess xwqqf, because that's not an English word. And more importantly, guessing some letters gives you information about the other letters. If you find out three letters, and have the target as _a_ts, you can use that to figure out the other two letters.

But if you need to guess a number, and you know it's _5_34, having three correct digits don't help you figure it out.

So I made some variants where guessed values do help you figure out the correct answer.

In rationerdle (https://zck.org/numberdle/?variant=rationerdle), you have to guess a rational number x/y, where both x and y are between 1 and 99, inclusive. It displays the rational number you actually guessed, and whether x and y separately are too high or too low.

In factordle (https://zck.org/numberdle/?variant=factordle), the player has to guess the factors of a target number.

In formuladle (https://zck.org/numberdle/?variant=formuladle), there is a graphed straight line, and the player has to guess the mx+b formula that graphs that line.

I would like to make more, but didn't have any other great ideas when I ran out of interest.

abotsis4 days ago

Yea, it’s too easy. Maybe if it were a “guess the number” but in binary? Hints are just “too high” or “too low”?

…though now that I’m playing it in my head that’s too easy too. (Start at MSB and shift right if too high and add bits if too low)…

Maybe if you reduced the number of guesses to 5 that’d add enough chance to make it fun?

TheDong4 days ago

It's not supposed to be fun or hard, it's supposed to be funny. It's absurdist humor.

James-Livesey4 days ago

If anyone's in need of a hexadecimal version... https://jamesl.me/hexle/

I similarly made a binary one before this version, but unsurprisingly, a lot of people said they found it too easy!

charlie-834 days ago

The hint actually makes it harder since I was required to guess a 0 and a F each time

NoSalt4 days ago

I did it in two attempts ... read it and weep, suckas!

NotAnOtter3 days ago

This delivers on the title but I wonder if you could tweak it to make it an actual game without wildly overcomplicating it.

Maybe make the string much longer, like 10 bits, and the game only matches on substrings longer than 3. 000...000 would generally return no matches.

That's still probably solvable with superpermutations but wordle is "solvable" with a dictionary, so don't let perfect be the enemy of "better than 2 guess bordle"

mulmen4 days ago

Got it in 10.

Black616Angel4 days ago

I was a bit sad, when it didn't display my number of tries as a 10.

mccolin4 days ago

There’s 10 types of people in this world: those that get that joke and those that don’t.

makerofthings4 days ago

There are 2 kinds of people in this world, those that can extrapolate from incomplete data.

taneq4 days ago

And fence post errors.

rodnim4 days ago

And those who know this joke is actually in base 3. :)

thehours4 days ago

Feedback: I'm unable to input with keyboard after typing anything but '0' until a full refresh (and selecting the input area with mouse).

Jtsummers4 days ago

You may not need the refresh, with Safari I have to select the game board again after focus is moved by clicking "play again".

lazerman4 days ago

The number of guesses should be written in binary too!

bitwrangler4 days ago

I like the UI and cute idea, nice animation. great way to learn xor $FF haha.

nickburlett4 days ago

Feature request: a "share" button, à la base-26 Wordle.

dhsysusbsjsi4 days ago

I guessed 00000 and won first go!

thinkingemote4 days ago

hmm. I guessed something different (010001 maybe, I cant remember) and won first go too. I looked in the comments hoping to find the joke. I guess I'm 1 of the 10 people who don't understand binary jokes.

thih94 days ago

For context, the original joke is:

> There are 10 kinds of people in this world — those who understand binary and those who don’t.

There are other versions too[1][2][3].

[1]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7036594

[2]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7040175

[3]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25854900

cnity4 days ago

Good one! I'm the other of the 10.

[deleted]4 days agocollapsed

Bimos4 days ago

Same here.

soneca4 days ago

I guessed my first game in the first attempt! (10011)

drooopy4 days ago

Guessed my first game in 2 attempts.

teekert4 days ago

What are the odds!

soneca4 days ago

3.125% I believe :)

thrance4 days ago

1 in 32

eckesicle4 days ago

Me too!

[deleted]3 days agocollapsed

[deleted]4 days agocollapsed

kylec4 days ago

Got it in one on my second game! Felt pretty good till I realized that's like 1/32 chance.

selcuka4 days ago

The probability of getting it right at least once in your first 2 attempts is even higher (6.15%).

bentt3 days ago

If this kind of troll app is what we can expect from our vibe coded future, then I'm all for it.

clocker4 days ago

Nice game. I got the answer in 1 try in my first attempt!

https://imgur.com/a/W4OjObH

clocker4 days ago

I made a game not exactly on the same line but related to decimal and binary numbers https://www.squashbyte.com/

Hope you like it!

Akranazon4 days ago

[dead]

meindnoch3 days ago

It's not wordle. It's bytle.

eludwig3 days ago

Closer to a nibble!

NooneAtAll33 days ago

bittle?

NooneAtAll33 days ago

recently I encountered a game that had "wordle, but with numbers" as one of its puzzles

https://semenar.itch.io/lost-in-space

HenryBemis4 days ago

So....

1st line, all zeros. It shows me where the zeros are.

Well.. that's it. Any non-zero is a 1.

So.. finished on the second line.

Am I the only one?

morcus4 days ago

Yeah, it's definitely meant to be a joke.

You also don't need to start with all zeros, any input will allow you to finish on the second try.

IAmBroom4 days ago

That didn't get it?

No, sadly.

citizenfishy4 days ago

Isn't this just Mastermind?

maaaaattttt4 days ago

Apologies for opening a tangeant on a tangeant, but am I the only one who thinks there are 2 levels of playing master mind (and therefore wordle)? Easy level, you let the player know exactly which spots are correctly placed and which ones are there but incorrectly placed. Hard level, you let the player know only that some are correctly placed and some are there but incorrectly placed without identifiying which ones. I personnaly don't enjoy the easy level when playing mastermind, but I do enjoy the hard version which is much more investigative and in my opinion triggers the same brain process as when I'm debugging code.

madcaptenor4 days ago

I don’t think I’ve ever seen Wordle implemented in what you call “hard level”. But there’s no reason it couldn’t be.

zaik4 days ago

No, this is much simpler.

jansan4 days ago

More like Minionmind.

lo_zamoyski4 days ago

Why 5 rows? Just have two.

seabass3 days ago

I love that not only are the inputs binary, but so are the results.

sarmadgulzar4 days ago

So, this can be solved in at least one and at most two attempts.

drdec3 days ago

With this game, there is no try. There is do or do not.

neuroelectron4 days ago

I see what you did there

kcaseg4 days ago

Bit masking : the game

celticninja4 days ago

Isn't it always possible to get this on guess 2?

oneeyedpigeon4 days ago

Yes. I think that's the joke.

sidcool4 days ago

It should be solvable in no more than 2 moves.

UnreachableCode4 days ago

Don’t you mean 10 moves?

amanverasia4 days ago

The only reason I logged into my account is to give you an upvote!

itishappy4 days ago

Is it possible to get yellow cells?

Jtsummers4 days ago

Use a mix of 0s and 1s, if the answer is "00110" and you put in "11000" you'll have 4 yellow and 1 green. If you use only 0s or only 1s for your first guess, you'll just get green and grey, no yellow.

itishappy4 days ago

Huh, surprisingly difficult to get. Took me 8 or so attempts.

[deleted]4 days agocollapsed

b0a04gl3 days ago

bitmask bruteforce took 5 ops max.solving fizzbuzz with a GPU.

october81404 days ago

Got it. Second try.

alloysmila4 days ago

only two attempts are ever needed :-(

[deleted]2 days agocollapsed

schindlabua4 days ago

Hilariously dumb

anon848736284 days ago

Made me chuckle out loud.

nicwolff3 days ago

I, uh, got it in two. Is it creepy that the answer is my ZIP code?

odo12424 days ago

I somehow got lucky and guessed the answer in just one try lol

rossant4 days ago

How lucky of you. You had one chance out of 100000.

[deleted]4 days agocollapsed

hn-front (c) 2024 voximity
source