fifiluraa day ago
I guess they are scientists and know better than me, but my bet is that is will just contain sludge.
Egg shells are more organic than you expect.
This is why you use stuff like waterglass https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sodium_silicate to seal them.
mulmena day ago
> Egg shells are more organic than you expect.
I expect them to be completely organic. What else would they be?
parl_match18 hours ago
namespace collision: to the layperson, it's organic because it came from an organism. from a chemical perspective, it's considered non-organic
i admit i read ops comment and was confused for a second until it clicked. they're mostly calcium carbonate
mulmen13 hours ago
I wondered about that but then in context wasn’t sure of the relevance. I’m aware that even fresh eggs are somewhat porous and wouldn’t expect the contents to last beyond a week before beginning to break down.
fifiluraa day ago
Mostly calcium carbonate.
[deleted]21 hours agocollapsed
foxyv18 hours ago
Calcium carbonate. So a salt I guess?
nyanpasu64a day ago
The eggshell looks like a century egg, but as mentioned by the comment the contents may have decomposed if the mud wasn't alkaline like the century egg production process.
phinnaeus13 hours ago
It’s a 17 century egg, to be precise
mseepgooda day ago
Of course they are going to break it.
shrxa day ago
I wonder why they don't put it in a CT scanner first before breaking it.
shrxa day ago
Apologies, apparently I missed this part in the article since the large ad banner immediately next to it distracted me.
coldpie21 hours ago
Install an ad blocker, friend!
efilife19 hours ago
ublock origin to be specific
Cyphasea day ago
> A Micro CT scan showed that this ancient egg is still full of liquid.
> “Researchers are planning to carefully extract the liquid to better study it,” stated Edward Biddulph, Senior Project Manager, who oversaw the site excavation. “It’s a controlled process similar to egg blowing, where a tiny hole is made in its shell after creating a 3D model.”
metalman20 hours ago
I think it is a mistake not to cut the top off the egg and just look inside as ancient egg shell has no value after it drys out and the visual information may be unique,so off with its top, and then take samples of the "liquid" and the inner shell lining, if it's present, and then see if there is any remaining structure of an embryo or the egg as laid.
fsckboya day ago
>Scientists are eager to use DNA testing to establish the species that laid the egg
how much DNA is in an egg, isn't it just a single cell with a single nucleus? and if unfertilized is haploid?
fbn79a day ago
In addition to the single nucleus the egg can contains trace of DNA from the mother
arsa day ago
I think they should not pierce it, but instead leave it for future humans to study.
teruakohatua day ago
Science funding requires doing something. Nobody funds you to not do something.
Regardless of getting funding, I don't see why our level of technology is not adequate to study an egg.
yumraj14 hours ago
Depending on how you look at it, the ones studying it are future humans.
timschmidta day ago
Forbidden breakfast!
creatonez11 hours ago
Don't worry, I'll find another one
robofanatica day ago
Story of an egg that never hatched.
anshumankmra day ago
I dare them to make an omelette wit that.
a3wa day ago
Can't make science without breaking an egg!
foreignera day ago
Fry it up with bog butter!
knighthack21 hours ago
I'm willing to bet there's a dragon in that egg.
kubba day ago
[flagged]
speerera day ago
What's your definition of a scientist?
I wonder if many of history's greatest scientists might fail to meet it.
viciousvoxela day ago
This is actually my wife's job/area of research, except typically they use the eggshell proteins to determine taxonomy. It's extremely rare that DNA survives in these types of samples but the proteins are preserved in the eggshell's mineral matrix.
jessekva day ago
"Scientist" is cool, but personally I would call myself a "forensic archeologist" if I had this gig.
viciousvoxela day ago
It's usually just called archaeology or perhaps biomolecular archaeology. Forensic archaeology is a bit different, and it usually pertains to humans and their crimes.
slow123_a day ago
duke dennis must’ve saved the egg for breakfast but forgot about it loll