concerndc1tizen3 days ago
Do I read correctly that this is related to "rsync daemon" (rsyncd), and therefore has minimal impact on people who just use rsync over ssh?
mhw3 days ago
My reading is that the first two CVEs are with rsync daemon, but the others are more general - I think "rsync server" is meaning the remote rsync process that is started when you use ssh to connect to the remote. Some of them suggest the rsync client (running on your machine) can be coerced to write to unexpected locations by a malicious rsync server specifically crafted to exploit these CVEs. One suggests a malicious rsync server might be able to reconstruct the contents of arbitrary files on the client using requests sent via the rsync protocol.
I guess the main takeaway is to be careful using rsync connections to machines that you don't trust.
crest3 days ago
It's the same protocol and code implementing it just proxied over SSH instead of a local pipe or unix socket pair. It's a real world issue unless you trust the remote rsync process and the connection with your local user. So basically only SSH between your single-user desktop and same single-user laptop is unimpacted.
formerly_proven3 days ago
Every rsync operation (even locally) involves an rsync client and a separate rsync server process.
bell-cot3 days ago
My read (not an expert) is that you are safe if your rsync is only via secure connections, to & from systems where untrusted parties can neither run rsync, nor play clever games with the files which rsync is accessing.
Which (in my paranoid opinion) is pretty much the only secure use case anyway, for code like rsync.
kees993 days ago
> you are safe if your rsync is only via secure connections
Not quite. If server has "command=rsync ..." in ~/.ssh/authorized_keys file, for some ssh key (to allow rsync access, but deny shell access), this vulnerability will allow attacker in possession of that ssh key to go around that restriction, and get shell nonetheless.
nrdvana3 days ago
He said where untrusted parties aren't able to run rsync.
If I was running an rsync daemon facing the public, it would be in a chroot with dropped privileges.
aaron6952 days ago
[dead]
throwaway9843933 days ago
[dead]
jmclnx3 days ago
Slackware sent a fixed version of rsync out yesterday.
But I wonder of OpenBSD's openrsync has the same issue ? Or did that version avoid the issues when it was created ?
If it was avoided, seems OpenBSD was ahead of the curve again.
somat3 days ago
openrsync is a neat story, it was made because they wanted to use rsync in the rpki system, but the standards body balked, saying they should not be using something where the standard was the implementation, so the openbsd folk(specifically Kristaps Dzonsons) stepped up and made a second rsync implementation so that the standards body could accept the protocol.
ducktective3 days ago
Debian issued a security update too:
rsync (3.2.7-1+deb12u1) bookworm-security; urgency=highcf100clunk3 days ago
I'm running several Linux distros and package updates to rsync version 3.2.7 have showed up on all of them already. I can't comment on openrsync.
crest3 days ago
Given the more permissive license openrsync would be in a pickle if they stole the vulnerable GPL code and claimed to redistribute it under BSD license instead of reimplementing the protocol.
snvzz2 days ago
Which is highly unlikely to happen in openbsd.
chasil3 days ago
Does this apply to the GPL or BSD codebase?
There are (now) two rsync codebases.
crest3 days ago
It applies to only to rsync and to not the (Open)BSD rewrite openrsync. openrsync intentionally doesn't reimplement all features so it's not always a drop in replacement.
samueloph3 days ago
There's a serious regression in the fixes: https://github.com/RsyncProject/rsync/issues/702
It impacts those who need to use `-r` (recursive) together with `-H` (preserve hardlinks),
SOLAR_FIELDS3 days ago
Fix was merged an hour ago, roughly an hour after you made this comment (at which time they were still working on it)
samueloph2 days ago
There's another one: https://github.com/RsyncProject/rsync/issues/715
[deleted]3 days agocollapsed
ThatGuyRaion3 days ago
Are these applicable to the openrsync project?
snvzz2 days ago
Openbsd do unsurprisingly have higher standards for code quality.
captainbland3 days ago
> Anonymous read access to a rsync server... such as on a public mirror
I did not know people did that.
arantius13 hours ago
For a concrete example: https://www.gentoo.org/support/rsync-mirrors/
Gentoo's package manager most typically updates over rsync.